Philosophy & Rhetoric Jan 2010

Perelman’s Interpretation of Reverse Probability Arguments as a Dialectical Mise en Abyme

Manfred Kraus

Abstract

Research Article| January 01 2010 Perelman's Interpretation of Reverse Probability Arguments as a Dialectical Mise en Abyme Manfred Kraus Manfred Kraus Department of Classics University of Tübingen Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (4): 362–382. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0362 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Manfred Kraus; Perelman's Interpretation of Reverse Probability Arguments as a Dialectical Mise en Abyme. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (4): 362–382. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0362 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2010 The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2010The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2010-01-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0362
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Anderson et al. (2020)
    Developments in Dissociation: Past Contexts, Present Applications, Future Impli…
    Philosophy & Rhetoric

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Jacob (1996)
    What if Aristotle took sophists seriously? New readings in Aristotle's<i>rhetoric</i>
    Rhetoric Review
  2. Poulakos (1995)
    Sophistical Rhetoric in Classical Greece
    College Composition and Communication
Also cites 20 works outside this index ↓
  1. Carawan, Edwin. 1998. Rhetoric and the Law of Draco. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
     ↗
  2. Dzialo, Michael G. 1998. “Legal and Philosophical Fictions: At the Line Where the Two Become One.” Argumentat…
     ↗
  3. Gagarin, Michael. 1990. “The Nature of Proofs in Antiphon.” Classical Philology 85 (1): 22–32.
     ↗
  4. Gagarin, Michael. 2001. “Did the Sophists Aim to Persuade?” Rhetorica 19 (3): 275–91.
     ↗
  5. Gagarin, Michael. 2002. Antiphon the Athenian: Oratory, Law, and Justice in the Age of the Sophists. Austin: …
     ↗
  6. Gagarin, Michael. 2007. “Background and Origins: Oratory and Rhetoric Before the Sophists.” In A Companion to…
     ↗
  7. Goebel, George H. 1989. “Probability in the Earliest Rhetorical Theory.” Mnemosyne 42 (1–2): 41– 53.
     ↗
  8. Hinks, D. A. G. 1940. “Tisias and Corax and the Invention of Rhetoric.” Classical Quarterly 34 (1–2): 61–69.
     ↗
  9. Hoffman, David C. 2008. “Concerning Eikos: Social Expectation and Verisimilitude in Early Attic Rhetoric.” Rh…
     ↗
  10. Mills, Eugene. 1998. “A Simple Solution to the Liar.” Philosophical Studies 89 (2–3): 197–212.
     ↗
  11. Priest, Graham. 1979. “The Logic of Paradox.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1): 219–41.
     ↗
  12. Priest, Graham. 1984. “Logic of Paradox Revisited.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 13 (2): 153–79.
     ↗
  13. Prior, Arthur N. 1958. “Epimenides the Cretan.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (3): 261–66.
     ↗
  14. Russell, Bertrand. 1908. “Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types.” American Journal of Mathematic…
     ↗
  15. Schmitz, Thomas A. 2000. “Plausibility in the Greek Orators.” American Journal of Philology 121 (1): 47–77.
     ↗
  16. Spatharas, Dimos G. 2001. “Patterns of Argumentation in Gorgias.” Mnemosyne 54 (4): 393–408.
     ↗
  17. Sutton, Jane. 1991. “Rereading Sophistical Arguments: A Political Intervention.” Argumentation 5 (2): 141–57.
     ↗
  18. Vega Renon, Luis. 1998. “Aristotle's Endoxa and Plausible Argumentation.” Argumentation 12 (1): 95–113.
     ↗
  19. Walton, Douglas. 2001. “Enthymemes, Common Knowledge, and Plausible Inference.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 34 (2…
     ↗
  20. Winter, Michael. 1997. “Aristotle, hōs epi to polu Relations, and a Demonstrative Science of Ethics. Phronesi…
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network →