Philosophy & Rhetoric Jan 2010

Perelman’s Interpretation of Reverse Probability Arguments as a Dialectical Mise en Abyme

Manfred Kraus

Abstract

Research Article| January 01 2010 Perelman's Interpretation of Reverse Probability Arguments as a Dialectical Mise en Abyme Manfred Kraus Manfred Kraus Department of Classics University of Tübingen Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (4): 362–382. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0362 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Manfred Kraus; Perelman's Interpretation of Reverse Probability Arguments as a Dialectical Mise en Abyme. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (4): 362–382. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0362 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2010 The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2010The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2010-01-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0362
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
rhetorical criticism social media
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Anderson et al. (2020)
    Developments in Dissociation: Past Contexts, Present Applications, Future Impli…
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Walton (2019)
    Plausible Argumentation in Eikotic Arguments: The Ancient Weak Versus Strong Ma…
    Argumentation

References (68) · 5 in this index

  1. Anastassiou, Jannis. 1981. “Die Wahrscheinlichkeitsargumentation als Beweismethode bei Gorgias.” Deukalion 36…
  2. Aristotle. 1926. Rhetoric. Trans. John Henry Freese. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  3. Barwise, Jon, and John Etchemendy. 1987. The Liar: An Essay on Truth and Circularity. Oxford: Oxford Universi…
  4. Billig, Michael. 1996. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. New ed. Cambridge: C…
  5. Carawan, Edwin. 1998. Rhetoric and the Law of Draco. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
     ↗
Show all 68 →
  1. Chantraine, Pierre. 1968–80. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque: Histoire des mots. 4 vols. Paris…
  2. Cole, Thomas. 1991. “Who was Corax?” Illinois Classical Studies 16 (1–2): 65–84.
  3. Crosswhite, James. 1989. “Universality in Rhetoric: Perelman's Universal Audience.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 2…
  4. Dällenbach, Lucien. 1977. Le récit spéculaire: Essai sur la mise en abyme. Paris: Seuil.
  5. Dällenbach, Lucien. 1989. The Mirror in the Text. Trans. Jeremy Whiteley and Emma Hughes. Chicago: University…
  6. Dearin, Ray D. 1982. “Perelman's Concept of ‘Quasi-Logical’ Argument: A Critical Elaboration.” In Advances in…
  7. Dzialo (1998)
    Legal and Philosophical Fictions: At the Line Where the Two Become One
    Argumentation
  8. Freud, Sigmund. 1960. Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious. Trans. and ed. James Strachey. London: Rou…
  9. Frisk, Hjalmar. 1960–70. Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. 2 vols. Heidelberg: Winter.
  10. Gagarin, Michael. 1989. The Murder of Herodes: A Study of Antiphon 5. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  11. Gagarin, Michael. 1990. “The Nature of Proofs in Antiphon.” Classical Philology 85 (1): 22–32.
     ↗
  12. Gagarin, Michael. 1994. “Probability and Persuasion: Plato and Early Greek Rhetoric.” In Persuasion: Greek Rh…
  13. Gagarin, Michael. 1997. Antiphon: The Speeches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Gagarin, Michael. 2001. “Did the Sophists Aim to Persuade?” Rhetorica 19 (3): 275–91.
     ↗
  15. Gagarin, Michael. 2002. Antiphon the Athenian: Oratory, Law, and Justice in the Age of the Sophists. Austin: …
     ↗
  16. Gagarin, Michael. 2007. “Background and Origins: Oratory and Rhetoric Before the Sophists.” In A Companion to…
     ↗
  17. Gide, André. 1948. Journal, 1889–1939. Paris: Seuil.
  18. Goebel, George H. 1989. “Probability in the Earliest Rhetorical Theory.” Mnemosyne 42 (1–2): 41– 53.
     ↗
  19. Goldman, William. 1987. The Princess Bride. Screenplay. www.dailyscript.com/scripts/princess_bride.html.
  20. Goldman, William. 2007 [1973]. The Princess Bride: S. Morgenstern's Classic Tale of True Love and High Advent…
  21. Hacking, Ian. 1975. The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas About Probability, Ind…
  22. Hinks, D. A. G. 1940. “Tisias and Corax and the Invention of Rhetoric.” Classical Quarterly 34 (1–2): 61–69.
     ↗
  23. Hoffman, David C. 2003. “Reversing Perceptions of Probability Through Self-Referential Argument: Interpretati…
  24. Hoffman, David C. 2008. “Concerning Eikos: Social Expectation and Verisimilitude in Early Attic Rhetoric.” Rh…
     ↗
  25. Hofstadter, Douglas R. 1979. Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. New York: Basic Books.
  26. Jacob (1996)
    What if Aristotle took sophists seriously? New readings in Aristotle'srhetoric
    Rhetoric Review
  27. Kennedy, George A. 1963. The Art of Persuasion in Greece. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  28. Kraus, Manfred. 2006. “Nothing to Do with Truth? Eikós in Early Greek Rhetoric and Philosophy.” Papers on Rhe…
  29. Kraus, Manfred. 2007. “Early Greek Probability Arguments and Common Ground in Dissensus.” In Dissensus and th…
  30. Kuebler, Clark George. 1944. The Argument from Probability in Early Attic Oratory. PhD diss., University of C…
  31. Lafille, Pierre. 1954. André Gide, romancier. Paris: Hachette.
  32. Magny, Claude-Edmonde. 1950. Histoire du roman français depuis 1918. Paris: Seuil.
  33. Mills, Eugene. 1998. “A Simple Solution to the Liar.” Philosophical Studies 89 (2–3): 197–212.
     ↗
  34. Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie. 1963. “Rencontre avec la rhétorique.” Logique et analyse 3:1–15.
  35. Perelman, Chaïm. 2001 [1970]. “The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning.” Trans. Evelyne Griffin-Col…
  36. Perelman, Chaïm. 1982. The Realm of Rhetoric. Trans William Kluback. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame…
  37. Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1958. Traité de l'argumentation: La nouvelle rhétorique. Paris: …
  38. Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise in Argumentation. Trans. John…
  39. Pokorny, Julius. 1989. Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Vol. 1. 2nd ed. Bern: Francke.
  40. Poulakos (1995)
    Sophistical Rhetoric in Classical Greece
    College Composition and Communication
  41. Priest, Graham. 1979. “The Logic of Paradox.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1): 219–41.
     ↗
  42. Priest, Graham. 1984. “Logic of Paradox Revisited.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 13 (2): 153–79.
     ↗
  43. Prior, Arthur N. 1958. “Epimenides the Cretan.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (3): 261–66.
     ↗
  44. Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1976. “The Ways of Paradox.” The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, 1–21. Rev. ed. C…
  45. Rescher, Nicholas. 1976. Plausible Reasoning. Assen: Van Gorcum.
  46. Russell, Bertrand. 1903. “Appendix B: The Doctrine of Types.” Principles of Mathematics, 523–28. Cambridge: C…
  47. Russell, Bertrand. 1908. “Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types.” American Journal of Mathematic…
     ↗
  48. Schank, Roger C., and Robert P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawre…
  49. Schiappa, Edward. 2003. Protagoras and Logos: A Study in Greek Philosophy and Rhetoric. 2nd ed. Columbia: Uni…
  50. Schmitz, Thomas A. 2000. “Plausibility in the Greek Orators.” American Journal of Philology 121 (1): 47–77.
     ↗
  51. Spatharas, Dimos G. 2001. “Patterns of Argumentation in Gorgias.” Mnemosyne 54 (4): 393–408.
     ↗
  52. Sutton (1991)
    Rereading sophistical arguments: A political intervention
    Argumentation
  53. Synodinou, Katerina. 1981. Eoika–eikós kai syggenikà apò ton Hómēro hōs ton Aristophanē: Sēmasiologike melétē…
  54. Tarski, Alfred. 1956. “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages.” Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, 152–…
  55. Tindale, Christopher W. 1999. Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument. Albany: State University of Ne…
  56. Turrini, Guido. 1977. “Contributo all'analisi del termine eikos: I. L'età arcaica.” Acme 30:541–58.
  57. Turrini, Guido. 1979. “Contributo all'analisi del termine eikos: II. Linguaggio, verosimiglianza e immagine i…
  58. Renon (1998)
    Aristotle's Endoxa and Plausible Argumentation
    Argumentation
  59. Walton, Douglas. 1992. Plausible Argument in Everyday Conversation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  60. Walton, Douglas. 1999. Appeal to Popular Opinion. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  61. Walton, Douglas. 2000. “Argumentation and Theory of Evidence.” In New Trends in Criminal Investigation and Ev…
  62. Walton, Douglas. 2001. “Enthymemes, Common Knowledge, and Plausible Inference.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 34 (2…
     ↗
  63. Winter, Michael. 1997. “Aristotle, hōs epi to polu Relations, and a Demonstrative Science of Ethics. Phronesi…
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Computers and Composition Jun 2026
    Navigating platform algorithms: Global south feminist activists’ rhetorical and composition practices in digital advocacy on social media ↗
    Kalpana Shrestha
    rhetorical criticism social media gender and writing
  2. Argumentation Feb 2026
    When Emmanuel Macron Goes Social: Using Social Media Influencers as a Rhetorical Strategy ↗
    Keren Sadoun-Kerber
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument collaborative writing social media affect and writing
  3. Res Rhetorica Jan 2026
    Normy retoryczne na pograniczu kultur – kampania wyborcza w mediach społecznościowych ↗
    Agnieszka Kampka
    rhetorical criticism social media
  4. Res Rhetorica Jan 2026
    Politicians’ privacy management in social media as a tool for shaping ethos ↗
    Anna M. Kiełbiewska
    rhetorical criticism argument social media public rhetoric
  5. Pedagogy Jan 2026
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism genre theory writing pedagogy graduate education two-year college teacher development social media race and writing gender and writing affect and writing literary studies editorial matter