Abstract

Research Article| January 01 2007 An Internal Connection between Logic and Rhetoric, and a Legitimate Foundation for Knowledge Jeremy Barris Jeremy Barris Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2007) 40 (4): 353–371. https://doi.org/10.2307/25655286 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Jeremy Barris; An Internal Connection between Logic and Rhetoric, and a Legitimate Foundation for Knowledge. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2007; 40 (4): 353–371. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/25655286 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2007 The Pennsylvania State University2007The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2007-01-01
DOI
10.2307/25655286
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (24)

  1. Almeder, Robert. 1993. “On Naturalizing Epistemology.” In Foundations of Philosophy of Science, ed. James H. …
  2. Aristotle. 1981. Aristotle's Posterior Analytics, trans. H. G. Apostle. Grinnell, IA: The Peripatetic Press.
  3. Barris, Jeremy. 1996. “The Foundation in Truth of Rhetoric and Formal Logic.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 29(4): …
  4. Bremer, Manuel. 2005. An Introduction to Paraconsistent Logics. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
  5. Derrida, Jacques. 1982. “Differance.” In Margins of Philosophy, trans. Alan Bass. Chicago: U of Chicago P.
Show all 24 →
  1. Davidson, Donald. 1984. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation…
  2. -. 1986. “Empirical Content.” In Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson,…
  3. Haack, Susan. 1978. Philosophy of Logics. New York: Cambridge UP.
  4. Hall, Everett W. 1960. Philosophical Systems: A Categorial Analysis. Chicago: U of Chicago P.
  5. Haraway, Donna J. 1991. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial P…
  6. Johnstone, Henry W., Jr. 1978. Validity and Rhetoric in Philosophical Argument: An Outlook in Transition. Uni…
  7. Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: U of Chicago P.
  8. Perelman, Chaim, andL. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, trans. John Wil…
  9. Plato. 1987. Theaetetus, trans. R. Waterfield. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
  10. Priest, Graham. 2001. An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  11. Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1961. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” In From a Logical Point of View: Nine Logico-hilo…
  12. -. 1969. “Ontological Relativity.” In Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia UP.
  13. Rorty, Richard. 1991. “Pragmatism, Davidson, and Truth.” In Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. New York: Cam…
  14. Schiller, F. C. S. 1912. Formal Logic: A Scientific and Social Problem. London: Macmillan.
  15. Smith, Barbara Herrnstein. 1997. Belief and Resistance: Dynamics of Contemporary Intellectual Controversy. Ca…
  16. Weimer, Walter B. 1977. “Science as a Rhetorical Transaction: Toward a Nonjustificational Concep- tion of Rhe…
  17. -. 1979. Notes on the Methodology of Scientific Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erl- baum.
  18. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
  19. -. 1961. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.