Abstract
The present study aims to investigate the extent to which L2 learners’ individual differences (field dependency and writing motivation) predict their retention of a teacher’s written corrective feedback (CF) in the short and in the long run. Using Ellis’s (2010) theoretical framework, the study examines the issue from cognitive and affective perspectives. Data was collected from 127 intermediate-level university students through written essays, a field-dependence/independence (FDI) questionnaire, and a writing motivation questionnaire, which were analyzed through t test, ANOVA, and multiple regression. The results reveal that there is a strong relationship between field independence (FI) style and the students’ successful short-term and long-term retention of corrections in the subsequent writings. Writing motivation, however, influences the short-term retention of CF only.
- Journal
- Journal of Response to Writing
- Published
- 2015-01-01
- CompPile
- Open Access
- OA PDF Gold
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Citation data not yet available for this article.
Citation data is not available for Journal of Response to Writing. This journal's publisher does not deposit reference lists with CrossRef.
Related Articles
-
Pedagogy Jan 2026
-
Writing and Pedagogy Dec 2025The Impact of a National Writing Project Site's Summer Institute: Exploring Educator Beliefs on Writing and Writing Instruction ↗H. Michelle Kreamer; Megan C. Breaux
-
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Jun 2025Comparative Study of Scientific Research Poster Design Favors Complete Assertion Headings and No Abstracts Over Other Formats ↗Joanna Wolfe; Juliann Reineke; Jennifer Lott
-
Rhetoric & Public Affairs Mar 2025Caddie Alford
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Sep 2024Timothy M. Ponce