Abstract

Research Article| January 01 2005 The Rhetoric of Prayer and Argument in Anselm Eileen Sweeney Eileen Sweeney Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2005) 38 (4): 355–378. https://doi.org/10.2307/40238273 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Eileen Sweeney; The Rhetoric of Prayer and Argument in Anselm. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2005; 38 (4): 355–378. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/40238273 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2005 The Pennsylvania State University2005The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2005-01-01
DOI
10.2307/40238273
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (25)

  1. Adams, Marilyn. 1995. “Praying the Proslogion: Anselm's Theological Method.” In The Rationality of Belief, 17…
  2. ---. 1972. “Was Anselm a Realist? The Monologium” Franciscan Studies 32 (Annual X): 5-14.
  3. Anselm. 1984. S. Anselmi Cantuariensis Archiepiscopi Opera Omnia, vols. 1-2. Ed. F.S. Schmitt. Stuttgart: Fri…
  4. Barth, Karl. 1960. Anselm: Fides Quarens Intellectum. Trans. W. Robertson. Richmond: John Knox Press.
  5. Bencinvenga, Emilio. 1993. Logic and Other Nonsense: The Case of Anselm and His God. Princeton: Princeton UP.
Show all 25 →
  1. Boyle, Marjorie O'Rourke. 1985. “Fools and Schools: Scholastic Dialectic, Humanist Rheto- ric; from Anselm to…
  2. Burke, Kenneth. 1969. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: U of California P.
  3. ---. 1970. The Rhetoric of Religion. Berkeley: U of California P.
  4. Clayton, John. 1995. “The Otherness of Anselm,” Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphi…
  5. Colish, Marcia. 1983a. “St. Anselm's Philosophy of Language Reconsidered.” Anselm Studies 1: 118.
  6. ---. 1983b. The Mirror of Language. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P.
  7. Dazeley, Howard L., and Wolfgang L. Gombocz. 1979. “Interpreting Anselm as Logician.” Synthèse 40: 86-90.
  8. Evans, Gillian. 1978. Anselm and Talking about God. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  9. ---. 1975. “The 'Secure Technician': Varieties of Paradox in the Writings of St. Anselm.” Vivarium 13 (1).
  10. Evdokimov, Paul. 1959. “L'aspect apophatique de l'argument de Saint Anselme.” In Spicilegium Beccense. Paris:…
  11. Hayen, André. 1967. “The Role of the Fool in St. Anselm and the Necessarily Apostolic Character of True Chris…
  12. Henry, Desmond Paul. 1967. The Logic of St. Anselm. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  13. Holpainen, Toivo. 1996. Dialectic and Theology in the Eleventh Century. New York: E.J. Brill.
  14. Mackey, Louis. 1997. Peregrinations of the Word. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P.
  15. McGill, Arthur C. 1967. “Recent Discussion of Anselm's Argument.” In The Many-Faced Argument, ed. John Hick a…
  16. Nichols, Aidan. 1985. “Anselm of Canterbury and the Language of Perfection.” Downside Review 103: 207.
  17. Southern, Richard W. 1990. Saint Anselm: Portrait in Landscape. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  18. ---, ed. and trans. 1972. The Life of St. Anselm Archbishop of Canterbury by Eadmer. London: Oxford UP.
  19. Stolz, Anselm. 1967. “Anselm's Theology in the Proslogion.” In The Many-Faced Argu- ment, ed. John Hick and A…
  20. van Buren, Paul M. 1973. “Anselm's Formula and the Logic of God.” Religious Studies 9: 285-86.