Abstract

Research Article| January 01 2005 Social Epistemologists at the Crossroads: Authorizing Agents of Change James H. Collier James H. Collier Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2005) 38 (3): 269–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/40238221 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation James H. Collier; Social Epistemologists at the Crossroads: Authorizing Agents of Change. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2005; 38 (3): 269–274. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/40238221 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2005 The Pennsylvania State University2005The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2005-01-01
DOI
10.2307/40238221
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (16)

  1. Basb0ll, Thomas. 2005. “Configuring the Usage: The Social Epistemologist as a Postmodern Grammarian.” Philoso…
  2. Bijker, Wiebe. 2003. “The Need for Public Intellectuals: A Space for STS.” Science, Tech- nology and Human Va…
  3. Campbell, John A., and Keith R. Benson. 1996. “The Rhetorical Turn in Science Studies.” Quarterly Journal of …
  4. Collier, James H., with David M. Toomey. 1997. Scientific and Technical Communication: Theory, Practice, and …
  5. Fuller, Steve, and James H. Collier. 2004. Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge: A New Beginning fo…
Show all 16 →
  1. Fuller, Steve. 1993. Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge: The Coming of Sci- ence and Technology S…
  2. ---. 1997. Science. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P.
  3. ---. 2000a. The Governance of Science: Ideology and the Future of the Open Society. Milton Keynes, UK: Open U…
  4. ---. 2000b. Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History of Our Times. Chicago: U of Chicago P.
  5. ---. 2002. Knowledge Management Foundations. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  6. ---. 2003. Kuhn vs. Popper: Prophets of the End of Science. London: Icon Books.
  7. Isager, Christine, and Sine Just. 2005. “Rhetoricians Identified: A Call to Interdisciplinary Action and How …
  8. Keith, William. 1995. “De Rhetorica Fullerae.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (4): 488-96.
  9. ---. 1996. “Review of Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 29 (2): 200-205.
  10. Lynch, Michael. 1994. “Review of Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge: The Coming of Science and Te…
  11. Zagacki, Kenneth S. 1995. “Review of Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge.” Quarterly Journal of Sp…