Abstract

Research Article| December 01 2018 Rational Model for Analyzing U.S. Foreign Policy Advocates and Decision Makers: The Newman Legacy Carol Winkler Carol Winkler Carol Winkler is Professor of Communication Studies at Georgia State University in Atlanta. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2018) 21 (4): 683–694. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.21.4.0683 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Carol Winkler; Rational Model for Analyzing U.S. Foreign Policy Advocates and Decision Makers: The Newman Legacy. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 December 2018; 21 (4): 683–694. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.21.4.0683 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2018 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2018 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Journal
Rhetoric & Public Affairs
Published
2018-12-01
DOI
10.14321/rhetpublaffa.21.4.0683
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (32)

  1. 1. Robert P. Newman, “The Criticism of Foreign Policy Argument,” in Proceedings of the Summer Conference on A…
  2. 2. Drew Westen, The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation (New York: Public…
  3. 3. Robert P. Newman, The Recognition of Communist China? A Study in Argument (New York: Macmillan, 1961).
  4. 4. Newman, “Criticism of Foreign Policy,” 94.
  5. 5. Robert P. Newman, Owen Lattimore and the “Loss” of China (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992).
Show all 32 →
  1. 6. Jonathan Spence, “Chinese Shadows,” New Republic 206 (1992): 34–38.
  2. 7. Nicholas R. Clifford, “Remember Red-Baiting,” Commonweal 119 (1992): 18–20.
  3. 8. T. Anton, “Book Reviews: Social Sciences,” Library Journal 117 (1992): 102.
  4. 9. Spence, “Chinese Shadows.”
  5. 10. Nancy Bernkopf Tucker, “Review of Books,” Pacific Historical Review 61 (1993): 523–25.
  6. 11. Athan Theoharis, “Book Reviews,” Journal of American History 79 (1993): 1677–78.
  7. 12. William Stueck, “Review of Books: United States,” American Historical Review 98 (1993): 1349–50.
  8. 13. Ellis Tinios, “Reviews and Short Notices: The Americas,” History 78 (1993): 480–81.
  9. 14. Spence, “Chinese Shadows,” 34.
  10. 15. Robert P. Newman, The Cold War Romance of Lillian Hellman and John Melby (Chapel Hill: University of Nort…
  11. 16. Robert P. Newman, Truman and the Hiroshima Cult (East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1995).
  12. 17. Ferenc M. Szasz, “Reviewed Work: Truman and the Hiroshima Cult by Robert P. Newman,” Presidential Studies…
  13. 18. Robert H. Ferrell, “Review: The Only Way Out,” Review of Politics 58 (1996): 659–60.
  14. 19. Robert L. Messer, “Reviews of Books: United States,” American Historical Review 102 (1997): 1253.
  15. 20. Sanho Tree, “Book Reviews,” Journal of American History 83 (1997): 1475–76.
  16. 21. Newman, Truman and the Hiroshima Cult.
  17. 22. David Howard, “Net Assessment,” Airpower Journal 13 (1999): 117–18.
  18. 23. Robert P. Newman, Enola Gay and the Court of History (New York: Peter Lang, 2004).
  19. 24. Robert P. Newman with David Deifull, Invincible Ignorance in American Foreign Policy: The Triumph of Ideo…
  20. 25. Corey Robin, “Protocols of Machismo,” London Review of Books, May 19, 2005, https://www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n10…
  21. 26. Robert P. Newman and Dale R. Newman, Evidence (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1969).
  22. 27. Robert P. Newman, “Ours Just to Reason Why,” Western Speech 33 (1969): 2–9.
  23. 28. Newman, “Ours Just to Reason.”
  24. 29. Newman, “Ours Just to Reason.”
  25. 30. Newman, “Ours Just to Reason.”
  26. 31. Newman, “Ours Just to Reason.”
  27. 32. Newman, “Ours Just to Reason.”