Fixating on the Stasis of Fact: Debating “Having It All” in U.S. Media
Abstract
Abstract Drawing on stasis theory, this essay explores how the debate frame functions within U.S. journalism. Using the news coverage of Marissa Mayer’s coinciding pregnancy and promotion to Yahoo! CEO and the reportage of Hillary Clinton’s upcoming grandchild during the 2016 precampaign as case studies, I develop a two-part argument. First, by analyzing the rhetorical mechanisms within this media debate, I demonstrate how the debate frame makes facts themselves infinitely debatable, thereby stagnating this public debate at the stasis of fact. This ultimately perpetuates the “having it all” debate—and its sexist assumptions. Second, I consider the escape routes out of this dominant discourse, analyzing how arguments maneuver beyond the stasis of fact to consider policy reforms regarding women in the workplace.
- Journal
- Rhetoric & Public Affairs
- Published
- 2017-06-01
- DOI
- 10.14321/rhetpublaffa.20.2.0253
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric Mar 2021Nicholas Lepp
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric Nov 2020Fielding Montgomery
-
Advances in the History of Rhetoric Sep 2016Arabella Lyon
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric May 2015Matthew Houdek
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric Feb 2015Belinda Walzer