Presidential Power and National Violence: James K. Polk’s Rhetorical Transfer of Savagery

Stephen J. Heidt

doi:10.14321/rhetpublaffa.19.3.0365

Rhetoric & Public Affairs Sep 2016

Presidential Power and National Violence: James K. Polk’s Rhetorical Transfer of Savagery

Stephen J. Heidt

Abstract

Abstract President James Knox Polk is often lauded for his achievements as president, including the territorial acquisition of the western portion of the nation. Critical attention to this legacy mostly focuses on his rhetorical strategy for putting the nation into war with Mexico. To date, no studies focus on Polk’s rhetorical strategy for ending the war. In this article, I examine Polk’s end-of-war rhetoric, attending to his rationalizations for exiting the war, his justification for resuming diplomatic relations with Mexico, and his identification of a new enemy requiring presidential and national attention. I argue that Polk’s pivot from Mexicans to Indians rhetorically transferred tropes of savagery to Indians, reenergized violence against Indians, and facilitated the institutionalization of management of Indian affairs via the creation of the Department of the Interior. I conclude that rhetorical critics should closely attend to the ways end-of-war rhetoric enables presidents to transition from one enemy to another while reaping institutional benefits.

Journal: Rhetoric & Public Affairs
Published: 2016-09-01
DOI: 10.14321/rhetpublaffa.19.3.0365
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (0)

No references on file for this article.

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Presidential Power and National Violence: James K. Polk’s Rhetorical Transfer of Savagery

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

References (0)

Related Articles