Abstract

Abstract This essay revisits William Jennings Bryan's campaign against evolutionary theory through analysis of four rhetorical moments—his platform orations “The Prince of Peace” (beginning in 1904) and “The Menace of Darwinism” (beginning in 1921), his testimony at the Scopes Trial, and his undelivered closing speech, “On Evolution.” In contrast to popular memory of Bryan as the fundamentalist fool, I maintain that he shared little rhetorical ground with his fundamentalist contemporaries, who tended to make arguments that used scientific reasoning to prove empirical facts of religious truth. Instead, Bryan opposed evolution through what Michael Lee has called the “populist argumentative frame,” a rhetorical orientation devoted to guarding the interests of the common people against an oppressive elite. Recognizing the populist foundations to Bryan's anti-evolution discourse, as well as the absence of fundamentalism in his discourse, helps to explain how Bryan fared so badly on the stand at the Scopes Trial.

Journal
Rhetoric & Public Affairs
Published
2013-09-01
DOI
10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.3.0489
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 3 works outside this index ↓
  1. “The Populist Chameleon: The People's Party, Huey Long, George Wallace, and the Populist …
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  2. “Bryan's ‘A Cross of Gold’: The Rhetoric of Polarization at the 1896 Democratic Convention,”
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  3. “The Foursquare Gospel of Aimee Semple McPherson,”
    Rhetoric & Public Affairs  
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →