Abstract
Abstract This essay argues for a reprivileging of the object of speech in the study of public address. To this end, public discourse concerning the tonal qualities of male and female speech, particularly in moments of affective transgression, is examined to better discern our deeply gendered, cultural norms of eloquence. The primary case study analyzes reactions to the oratory ofBarack Obama and Hillary Clinton to show how their respective vocal tones played a significant role in the 2008 presidential election.
- Journal
- Rhetoric & Public Affairs
- Published
- 2010-06-01
- DOI
- 10.2307/41940491
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
CrossRef global citation count: 10
View in citation network →
Related Articles
-
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jan 2026Advantages and Challenges of Creating User Documentation in Agile Development Contexts: A Qualitative Interview Study ↗Marjorie Rush Hovde; Brea Threatt
-
Journal of Business and Technical Communication Apr 2025Korean Professionals’ Experience With Using Business English as a Lingua Franca (BELF): A Grounded Theory Approach ↗Kanghee Lee
-
Written Communication Jan 2025Getting to “the Upper End of the Novice Zone”: An Exploration of Doctoral Students’ Writer Identity in Coauthoring With Supervisors for Publication ↗Jiayu Wang; Cassi Liardét
-
Computers and Composition Dec 2024Unveiling the affective digital counterpublic: A rhetorical ecological analysis of the #JusticeForNaqib movement in Pakistan ↗Salma Kalim
-
Research in the Teaching of English Aug 2024An Eight-Year Longitudinal Study of an English Language Arts Teacher’s Developmental Path through Multiple Contexts ↗Peter Smagorinsky; Stacia L. Long