Abstract

Abstract This article discusses a resurgent banking concept of education laid bare by the coronavirus pandemic. It uses the theories of Paulo Freire, Mark Fisher, Michel Foucault, and Saidiya Hartman to articulate how learning-management systems undermine literary study's problem-posing educational paradigm and how to retain it amid increasing technocratic pressures.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2023-04-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-10295955
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Pedagogy

References (15)

  1. Neoliberalism, Technocracy, and Higher Education: Editors’ Introduction
    Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture, and Policy  
  2. Postscript on Societies of Control
    October
  3. Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative?
  4. 1 March 1978
  5. Pedagogy of the Oppressed
Show all 15 →
  1. Venus in Two Acts
    Small Axe  
  2. Wayward Lives, Beautiful Experiments: Intimate Histories of Social Upheaval
  3. Capital, Neoliberalism, and Educational Technology
    Postdigital Science and Education  
  4. Paulo Freire and Ivan Illich: Technology, Politics, and the Reconstruction of Education
    Policy Futures in Education  
  5. Neoliberalism, Technology, and the University: Max Weber's Concept of Rationalization as …
  6. Riggs Shannon A. , and LinderKathryn E.2016. “Actively Engaging Students…
  7. The Politics of Education and Technology: Conflicts, Controversies, and Connections
  8. Stiles Anne . n.d. “The Rest Cure, 1873–1925.” In BRANCH: Britain, Repre…
  9. Racial Indigestion: Eating Bodies in the Nineteenth Century
  10. Pandemic Politics, Pedagogies, and Practices: Digital Technologies and Distance Education…
    Learning, Media, and Technology