Abstract

College and university English departments always are active places, but those in many public liberal arts colleges are notably pleasant, as well. What accounts for this? Though these small academic units clearly learn much from large research institutions, perhaps the learning can be mutual. A question arises, however: can this oxymoronic blend of high-pitched professionalism and felicity be maintained?

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2010-04-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-2009-040
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 4 works outside this index ↓
  1. Burgan, Mary. 2006. What Ever Happened to the Faculty: Drift and Decision in Higher Education. Baltimore, MD:…
  2. Mattson, Kevin. 2005. “Why `Active Learning' Can Be Perilous to the Profession.” Academe Online. www.aaup.org…
  3. Schwartz, Lawrence. 2003. “The Postmodern English Major: A Case Study.” ADE Bulletin133: 16–24.
  4. Shephard, Alan. 2003. “Gumbo? On the Logic of Undergraduate Curricula in English Studies.” ADE Bulletin133: 25–28.
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →