Abstract
With neither national nor local-level discussions of Senate Bill 1070 adequately addressing bottom line issues such as marginalization, access, and civic engagement, an exploration of marginalized rhetorical acts can provide an informative lens for understanding challenges among marginalized people, their rhetorical tools, and their relations to public spheres. Through an exploration of anti-Senate Bill 1070 graffiti, this article examines how the practice of graffiti points to difference manifesting and playing out in the wider public sphere. It calls for scholars and activists to recognize graffiti as a rhetorical tool worthy of study and cross-cultural discourse.
- Journal
- Community Literacy Journal
- Published
- 2014-10-01
- DOI
- 10.25148/clj.9.1.009299
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- OA PDF Gold
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Rhetoric & Public Affairs Mar 2023Anna M. Young
-
Prompt: A Journal of Academic Writing Assignments Aug 2022Cartographic Composition Across the Curriculum: Promoting Cartographic Literacy Using Maps as Multimodal Texts ↗Joy Santee
-
Advances in the History of Rhetoric May 2017Matthew Bost
-
Composition Forum 2017Christopher Minnix
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric May 2015Matthew Houdek