Abstract
This article examines tensions within infertility advocacy campaigns, like #Access2Care, which seek to improve access to healthcare, yet, at times operate within an advocacy framework that fails to listen to the very subjects they seek to empower. Ultimately, such actions lead to a misrepresentation of what empowerment means for the advocacy subject, and in doing so, fractures coalition-building. In response to these shortcomings, I outline a rhetorical framework built on relational advocacy and illustrate how rhetorical scholars can contribute to advocacy campaigns.
- Journal
- Present Tense: A Journal of Rhetoric in Society
- Published
- 2021-06-22
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- OA PDF Gold
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Citation data not yet available for this article.
Citation data is not available for Present Tense: A Journal of Rhetoric in Society. This journal's publisher does not deposit reference lists with CrossRef.
Related Articles
-
Res Rhetorica Apr 2026The rhetorical dimension of the justification for the absence of direct military support for Ukraine in Joe Biden’s statements ↗Marta Kobylska
-
Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric Feb 2026Laura Gonzales
-
Rhetoric of Health and Medicine Feb 2026Using Natural Language Processing to Rhetorically Contextualize Audiences: Vaccine Sentiment Analysis of Newspaper Comments, 2017–2023 ↗Aaron Beveridge; Meriel Burnett; John R. Gallagher
-
Pedagogy Jan 2026
-
Rhetoric of Health and Medicine Dec 2025The Constitution of Individual Rhetorical Agency in a Health Risk Situation: How an influencer is Putting AMR on the Agenda ↗Dorthea Roe; Jens Kjeldsen