Abstract
In this article, I examine a terminology of violence rooted within political consensus. Taking the Rwandan genocide as a case study, the article argues that a Burkean dialectic transformation of terms offers a way to understand violent conflicts with an agonistic approach. Arguing against consensus, the article puts Burke into conversation with Chantal Mouffe to show where merger might be possible amongst antagonistic parties.
- Journal
- KB Journal: The Journal of the Kenneth Burke Society
- Published
- 2019-06
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- OA PDF Gold
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Citation data not yet available for this article.
Citation data is not available for KB Journal: The Journal of the Kenneth Burke Society. This journal's publisher does not deposit reference lists with CrossRef.
Related Articles
-
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Mar 2026US Hospital Educators' Technology Needs: A Qualitative Study for Developing Action-Oriented Technology ↗Margaret Webb; Sweta Baniya; Alexa Smith; Nadra Rasberry; Ihudiya Ogbonnaya-Ogburu
-
Res Rhetorica Dec 2024Marcin Będkowski; Kinga Rogowska
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric Sep 2024Joshua Hananmodern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism composition theory genre theory discourse analysis cultural rhetorics argument qualitative research quantitative research digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric affect and writing body and rhetoric editorial matter
-
Rhetoric & Public Affairs Jun 2024Michelle G. Gibbons
-
Pedagogy Jan 2024Sarah Moon