Computers and Composition Sep 2010

Carving up the Commons: How Software Patents Are Impacting Our Digital Composition Environments

Annette Vee University of Pittsburgh
Journal
Computers and Composition
Published
2010-09-01
DOI
10.1016/j.compcom.2010.06.006
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Young (2020)
    Your Digital Alter Ego - The Superhero/Villain You (Never) Wanted Transcending …
    Computers and Composition

References (52) · 5 in this index

  1. Ballentine, Brian. (2009). Hacker ethics and Firefox extensions: Writing and teaching the “grey” areas of Web…
  2. Bernstein v. U.S. Department of State, et al. 176 F. 3d 1132 (1997).
  3. Bilski et al. vs. Kappos 561 U.S. _____ (2010). [[[Editors: New reference to reflect the 6/28/10 Supreme Cour…
  4. Bolter (1991)
    Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the history of writing
  5. Boyle (1996)
    Shamans, software, and spleens: Law and the construction of the information society
Show all 52 →
  1. Carmack, John. (1997, November 25). John Carmack - The Boot Interview (with Alex St. John). The John Carmack …
  2. Carmack, John. (2000, September 18). Knee deep in John Carmack (interview with Billy “Wicked” Wilson). The Jo…
  3. Cummings (2006)
    Coding with power: Toward a rhetoric of computer coding and composition
    Computers and Composition
  4. digirhet. (2008). Old+old+old=new: A copyright manifesto for the digital world. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric…
  5. Diamond v. Diehr. 450 U.S. 175 (1981).
  6. Durack (2001)
    Research Opportunities in the US Patent Record
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. Durack (2006)
    Technology Transfer and Patents: Implications for the Production of Scientific …
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  8. Fisher, Ken. (2004). Microsoft patenting new Office XML format. Ars Technica. Retrieved from http://arstechni…
  9. Fortune et al. (1999)
    Letter from the guest editors
    Computers and Composition
  10. Garfinkel, Simon; Stallman, Richard; & Kapor, Mitchell. (1991). Why patents are bad for software. Issues in S…
  11. Gibson, Steve. (2004). Creative Labs patent & DOOM 3. ShackNews. Retrieved from http://www.shacknews.com/onea…
  12. Gottschalk v. Benson. 409 U.S. 63 (1972).
     ↗
  13. Graham, Paul. (2006). Are software patents evil? PaulGraham.com. Retrieved from http://www.paulgraham.com/sof…
  14. Guibault (2006)
    Unravelling the myth around open source licenses: An analysis from a Dutch and European law perspective. Information Technology and Law Series
  15. Gurak (1997)
    Technical communication, copyright, and the shrinking public domain
    Computers and Composition
  16. IBM's Supreme Court brief says that patents drive free software. (2009). Slashdot. Retrieved from http://yro.…
  17. In re Alappat. 33 F. 3d 1526 (1994).
     ↗
  18. In re Bilski. 545 F. 3d 943 (2008).
  19. Jacobsen, Bob. (n.d.). JMRI defense: Keeping an open-source project alive. JMRI.org. Retrieved from http://jm…
  20. Jaffe (2004)
    Innovation and its discontents
  21. Jones, Pamela. (2006, May 14). The Model Train Patent Story - Jacobsen v. Katzer et al. Groklaw. Retrieved fr…
  22. Jones, Pamela. (2009). Professor Hollaar's amicus brief in Bilski. Groklaw. Retrieved from http://www.groklaw…
  23. Klemens (2006)
    Math you can’t use
  24. Leblanc (1993)
    Writing teachers writing software. Advances in Computers and Composition Studies
  25. Lessig (2001)
    The future of ideas: The fate of the commons in a connected world
  26. Logie, John. (2005). Parsing codes: Intellectual property, technical communication, and the World Wide Web. I…
  27. Marino, Mark. (2006). Critical code studies. Electronic Book Review. Retrieved from http://www.electronicbook…
  28. Nard, Craig A.; Barnes, David W.; & Madison, Michael J. (2006). The law of intellectual property. New York: A…
  29. On software patent lawsuits against OSS. (2006, June 30). Slashdot. Retrieved from http://yro.slashdot.org/ar…
  30. Papert (1980)
    Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas
  31. Parloff, Roger. (2007). Microsoft takes on the free world: Microsoft claims software like Linux violates its …
  32. Parker v. Flook. 437 U.S. 584 (1978).
  33. Perlis, Alan. (1964). The computer and the university. In Martin Greenberger (Ed.), Computers and the world o…
  34. PolR. (2009, November 11). An explanation of computation theory for lawyers. Retrieved from http://www.grokla…
  35. Rieder (2008)
    Scripted writing: Exploring generative dimensions of writing in Flash ActionScript
    Small tech: The culture of digital tools
  36. Salin, Phillip. (1991). Freedom of speech in software (RE: Request for comments, Advisory Commission on Paten…
  37. Samuelson, Pamela. (1990). Benson revisited: The case against patent protection for algorithms and other comp…
  38. Samuelson, Pamela. (2007). Software patents and the metaphysics of section 271(f). Communications of the ACM,…
     ↗
  39. Schonfeld, Erick. (2009). Here come the Twitter patent lawsuits. TechCrunch. Retrieved from http://www.techcr…
  40. Selfe (1994)
    The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones
    College Composition and Communication  ↗
  41. Shiva, Vandana. (2001). Patents: Myths and reality. New Delhi: Penguin Books.
  42. Smith, Andy. (2009). #songsincode—Birthing a trend. Retrieved from http://docs.google.com/View?id=dcg768xk_4f…
  43. Stallman, Richard. (2009). How the Swedish Pirate Party Platform backfires on free software. GNU Operating Sy…
  44. State Street Bank and Trust v. Signature Financial Group. 149 F.3d 1368, 1375 (1998)s.
  45. Warshofsky, Fred. (1994). The patent wars. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  46. (2009)
    Composition & copyright
  47. Wing (2006)
    Computational thinking
    Communications of the ACM  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network → Build reading path →