Computers and Composition Jan 2006

How the views of faculty can inform undergraduate Web-based research: Implications for academic writing

Rena Helms-Park ; Paul Stapleton Hokkaido University
Journal
Computers and Composition
Published
2006-01-01
DOI
10.1016/j.compcom.2006.08.003
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Turnley (2011)
    Towards a Mediological Method: A Framework for Critically Engaging Dimensions o…
    Computers and Composition

References (30) · 2 in this index

  1. Auer, Nicole J. (2002). Bibliography on evaluating Web information. Retrieved Sept. 22, 2003, from <http://we…
  2. Barker, Joe (2004). Evaluating Web pages: Techniques to apply and questions to ask. Retrieved Jan. 25, 2004 f…
  3. Branscomb (1998)
    Casting your net: A student's guide to research on the Internet
  4. Burton et al. (2000)
    Investigating the practices of student researchers: patterns of use and criteri…
    Computers and Composition
  5. Davis (2001)
    The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior, 1996–1999
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology  ↗
Show all 30 →
  1. diYanni (1998)
    The Scribner handbook for writers
  2. Fisher (1963)
    Statistical tables for biological, agricultural and medical research
  3. Goldbort (1993)
    Clarity and rigor in scientific writing
    Journal of Environmental Health
  4. Goldbort (2001)
    Scientific writing as an art and as a science
    Journal of Environmental Health
  5. Grassian, Esther (2000). Thinking critically about World Wide Web resources. Retrieved Sept. 22, 2003, from <…
  6. Hairston (1996)
    The Scott Foresman handbook for writers
  7. Hamp-Lyons (1991)
    Scoring procedures for ESL contexts
    Assessing second language writing in academic contexts
  8. Hartman, Karen, & Ackermann, Ernest (2001). Meeting the challenge of critically evaluating information on the…
  9. Helms-Park, Rena, & Stapleton, Paul. (2004). Rating first-year EAP students’ Web-based research materials. Pa…
  10. Humphries, LaJean (2002). How to evaluate a Website. Retrieved Jan. 25, 2004, from <http://web.llrx.com/featu…
  11. Jarvis (2001)
    Internet usage of English for academic purposes courses
    ReCall  ↗
  12. Kirk, Elizabeth E. (2002). Evaluating information found on the Internet. Retrieved Sept. 22, 2003, from <http…
  13. Kress (2003)
    Literacy in the new media age
  14. McLachlan, Karen (2002). Web cyberguide ratings for content evaluation. Retrieved Jan 28, 2004, from <http://…
  15. Pasch (2001)
    Using Internet primary sources to teach critical thinking skills in world languages
  16. Shetzer (2000)
    An electronic literacy approach to network-based language learning
    Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice
  17. Slaouti (2002)
    The World Wide Web for academic purposes: Old study skills for new?
    English for Specific Purposes  ↗
  18. Sorapure et al. (1998)
    Web literacy: Challenges and opportunities for research in a new medium
    Computers and Composition
  19. Stapleton (2005)
    Using the Web as a research source: Implications for L2 academic writing
    Modern Language Journal  ↗
  20. The Economist (2004). How PageRank works. Retrieved Sept. 25, 2004 from <http://www.economist.com/science/tq/…
  21. Tillman, Hope N. (2000). Evaluating quality on the net. Retrieved Sept. 22, 2003, from <http://web.hopetillma…
  22. Troyka (2002)
    Simon and Schuster handbook for writers
  23. Tuman (2002)
    Criticalthinking.com: A guide to deep thinking in a shallow age
  24. Valmont (2003)
    Technology for literacy teaching and learning
  25. Voss (1983)
    Composition and the empirical imperative
    Journal of Advanced Composition
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network → Build reading path →