Symposium On Peer Review
Abstract
In this Symposium focused on peer review, Irwin Weiser—drawing both on history and on his own experience as faculty member, WPA, department head, and dean—examines the set of practices we associate with the tenure and promotion process, finding that they differ across sites at the same time that they look very similar in their assumptions. Weiser’s review then culminates in a set of questions useful as a heuristic for the multiple stakeholders involved in the process. In the next and complementary article, Cynthia Selfe and Gail Hawisher—drawing on their varied experiences as authors and publishers of a journal and several book series—provide a historical review and consideration of peer review in publishing. They find that scholarly peer review, from the question of signed reviews to the practices of digital publications, is in the midst of change, but that at the same time, a reviewing process of some sort is still the mainstay of publishing.
- Journal
- College Composition and Communication
- Published
- 2012-06-01
- DOI
- 10.58680/ccc201220302
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
College Composition and Communication Sep 2018Ellery Sills
-
Written Communication Jan 2013Dylan B. Dryer
-
College Composition and Communication Dec 2010Cornelius Cosgrove
-
Written Communication Feb 2026Reading Medium and Communicative Purpose in Writing: Effects on Pausing Behaviour and Text Quality, Controlling for Reading Comprehension and Executive Functions ↗Ángel Valenzuela; Cristian A. Rojas-Barahona; Ramón D. Castillo; Ladislao Salmerón
-
Written Communication Feb 2026Jonathan Marine; Jason Grant; Paul Rogers