Abstract
Confronts the problem of applicants for admittance to graduate programs in the Humanities failing to have been told what would be wanted on their applications. Discusses helping students learn to explain their specialties to nonspecialists. Assumes that learning to summarize and “enter the conversations around one” is excellent rhetorical training regardless of the student’s profession.
- Journal
- College English
- Published
- 1999-11-01
- DOI
- 10.58680/ce19991165
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
CrossRef global citation count: 0
View in citation network →
Related Articles
-
Computers and Composition Jun 2026“Article laundry” or “tutor in pocket?”: Multilingual writers’ generative AI-assisted writing in professional settings ↗Qianqian Zhang-Wu
-
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Apr 2026Emily Kuzneski Johnson
-
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Apr 2026Leslie Seawright; Amy Hodges; Timothy Ponce
-
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Apr 2026How to Write With GenAI: A Framework for Using Generative AI to Automate Writing Tasks in Technical Communication ↗Guiseppe Getto; Susan Kelley; Bremen Vance
-
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Mar 2026“It's Hard to Show ROI When You’re Preventing Things from Happening”: How Impact Storytelling Frames Community Health Initiatives for Executive Audiences ↗Margaret Hsiao