Abstract

In this article, we present a method for analyzing the communication of people who exchange dynamic and complex information to come to a shared understanding of situations and of the actions planned and monitored by one party, but executed remotely by another. To examine this situation, we analyzed dispatchers working in police dispatch center in a large city in the Netherlands and their communication behavior in three different settings. The results of our analyses answer the question of how collaborative parties should assess an emergency situation in order to decide how to handle the incident in accordance with the procedures. Our results indicate which information must be communicated in order to deal with the current problem during the course of an incident. We will also demonstrate the proposed way of analyzing the communication used here is needed to understand how information is collaboratively handled in complex tasks.

Journal
Communication Design Quarterly
Published
2017-05-04
DOI
10.1145/3090152.3090155
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 15 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1145/320297.320308
  2. Beyer H. & Holtzblatt K. (1997). Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. San Diego: Elsevier. …
  3. 10.1080/01690968708406350
  4. 10.1558/sll.2006.13.1.55
  5. 10.1007/BF00752451
  6. Kirwan B. & Ainsworth L. K. (1992). A guide to task analysis: The task analysis working group. Boca Raton: CR…
  7. Klein G. Feltovich P. J. Bradshaw J. M. & Woods D. D. (2005). Common ground and coordination in joint activit…
  8. 10.1080/00140139308968005
  9. 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.014
  10. 10.1080/00140139008927167
  11. 10.1145/2639189.2639197
  12. Suchman L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge…
  13. 10.1007/BF00749015
  14. 10.1093/bja/aeq135
  15. 10.1145/1125944.1125978
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →