Abstract
This assignment aims to help nascent scholars break into print and develop scholarly connections between their own areas of interest and the subfield of rhetoric, composition, and writing studies (RC&WS). Drawing on advice from Ballif et al. (2008), students in my graduate seminar write a publication quality book review of a recently published monograph in RC&WS. After a series of priming activities, students engage in a structured peer review that follows guidelines I developed as book review editor at Composition Studies.
- Journal
- Prompt: A Journal of Academic Writing Assignments
- Published
- 2022-08-17
- DOI
- 10.31719/pjaw.v6i2.112
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Topics
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
CrossRef global citation count: 0
View in citation network →
Related Articles
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Oct 2024“Possibly Include Maybe a Fact. . .Perhaps”: Language in Business Communication Students’ Peer Feedback ↗Nicole A. Ploeger-Lyons; Jane Strong
-
Assessing Writing Apr 2023The relationship between peer feedback features and revision sources mediated by feedback acceptance: The effect on undergraduate students’ writing performance ↗Qi Lu; Yuan Yao; Xinhua Zhu
-
Written Communication Jul 2017The Effect of Keyboard-Based Word Processing on Students With Different Working Memory Capacity During the Process of Academic Writing ↗Steffie Van Der Steen; Dianne Samuelson; Jennifer M. Thomson
-
Research in the Teaching of English Nov 2013Systems of Writing Response: A Brazilian Student’s Experiences Writing for Publication in an Environmental Sciences Doctoral Program ↗Steve Simpson
-
Enculturation Sep 2012steelwagstaff