Abstract

ABSTRACTThis paper reviews and compares diverse rhetorical conceptualizations within Chinese rhetorical tradition during the fifth to third century B.C.E. Textual evidence shows that three schools of thoughts, namely Confucianism, Daoism, and Mohism, have contested with and challenged one another on the components and functions of rhetoric. Confucianism is more concerned with the moral character of the speaker while Mohism claims that rhetoric is used for mutual benefit and contains a rational element. Daoism, on the other hand, approaches rhetoric with a transcendental and dialectical outlook. This overview demonstrates the multi-faceted characteristics of ancient Chinese rhetoric.

Journal
Advances in the History of Rhetoric
Published
2019-05-04
DOI
10.1080/15362426.2019.1618052
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. College English
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 3 works outside this index ↓
  1. Classical Chinese Conceptions of Argumentation and Persuasion
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  2. Rhetorical Emphasis of Taoism
    Rhetorica  
  3. Rhetoric before and beyond the Greeks
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →