Abstract

ABSTRACT This essay discusses the relationship between Quintilian’s vision of the ideal orator and his emphasis on declamation. I argue that, for Quintilian, declamation was much more than a useful exercise. Rather, it was a method for training orators to experience the world from a variety of perspectives, something Quintilian considered to be both an essential rhetorical skill and an important quality of the “good man speaking well.” I further argue—taking an exercise from my own first-year writing classes as an example—that contemporary adaptations of ancient rhetorical pedagogy often fail to fully engage with the ethical dimensions of exercises such as declamation. I conclude by calling for a greater consideration of the ethical dimension of ancient rhetorical exercises in our contemporary adaptations of them so that we can truly meet Quintilian on his own ground.

Journal
Advances in the History of Rhetoric
Published
2016-05-03
DOI
10.1080/15362426.2016.1182403
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 5 works outside this index ↓
  1. Ethics, Identity, and Community in Later Roman Declamation
  2. The Declamations of Calpurius Flaccus. Trans. Lewis A. Sussman
  3. Writing without Teachers
  4. Quintilian and the Pedagogy of Argument
    Argumentation  
  5. A Short History of Writing Instruction
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →