The State of Babel After the Fall: Philo Judaeus and the Possibility of Rhetoric

Advances in the History of Rhetoric Jan 2014

The State of Babel After the Fall: Philo Judaeus and the Possibility of Rhetoric

Joshua Reeves

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article contextualizes Philo Judaeus’s treatise De Confusione Linguarum in rhetorical and intellectual history. While most interpretations of the Tower of Babel legend have found that its primary function is to explain the dispersion of the world’s diverse nations and languages, Philo argues that the “confusion of tongues” signifies a more basic existential condition. For Philo, this confusion disrupted humankind’s capacity for perfect communication, helping us value rhetorical action as an essential element of the confused, ongoing process of struggle that characterizes our everyday sociality. The confusion of tongues, therefore, simultaneously gave rise to rhetoric and the masses, as it imposed a principle of difference in language and discordant heterogeneity in the social order.

Journal: Advances in the History of Rhetoric
Published: 2014-01-02
DOI: 10.1080/15362426.2014.886927
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Topics: multilingual writers

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

Davis (2008)

Identification: Burke and Freud on Who You Are

Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Also cites 7 works outside this index ↓

Burke (1969)

A Rhetoric of Motives

↗
Di Cesare (2012)

Utopia of Understanding: Between Babel and Auschwitz

↗
Hiebert (2007)

The Tower of Babel and the Origin of the World’s Cultures

Journal of Biblical Literature ↗
Lauterbach (1911)

The Ancient Jewish Allegorists in Talmud and Midrash

Jewish Quarterly Review ↗
Lauterbach (1911)

The Ancient Jewish Allegorists in Talmud and Midrash (Concluded)

Jewish Quarterly Review ↗
Marcos (2000)

The Septuagint in Context: Introduction to the Greek Version of the Bible

↗
Peters (1999)

Speaking Into the Air: A History of the Idea of Communication

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →