Advances in the History of Rhetoric Jan 2012

Mentoring Rhetoric's Historians

Roxanne Mountford

Abstract

ABSTRACT This response article focuses on the goals for research stated and implied in the contributors' work, comparing them with the goals of earlier generations of scholars in the history of rhetoric. Through mentoring, scholars pass on both the strengths and limitations of the field, which are then “embodied” by the next generation. One impulse remains constant: to enrich the field by identifying new sites for rhetorical investigation.

Journal
Advances in the History of Rhetoric
Published
2012-01-01
DOI
10.1080/15362426.2012.657061
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (9)

  1. Agnew et al. (2011)
    Rhetorical Historiography and the Octalogs
    Rhetoric Review
  2. Agnew et al. (2011)
    Octalog III: The Politics of Historiography in 2010
    Rhetoric Review
  3. Miller (2001)
    Disciplinary identifications/public identities: A response to Mailloux, Leff, a…
    Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Keith (2000)
    Identity, rhetoric and myth: A response to Mailloux and leff<sup>1</sup>
    Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. Leff (2000)
    Rhetorical disciplines and rhetorical disciplinarity: A response to Mailloux
    Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Show all 9 →
  1. Mailloux (2000)
    Disciplinary identities: On the rhetorical paths between English and communicat…
    Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Enos et al. (1997)
    Octalog II: The (continuing) politics of historiography (Dedicated to the memor…
    Rhetoric Review
  3. Mountford et al. (1996)
    Rhetoric and graduate studies: Teaching in a postmodern age
    Rhetoric Review
  4. Murphy et al. (1988)
    The politics of historiography
    Rhetoric Review
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →