Abstract

Abstract At Pseudolus 41–73 Plautus represents the slave Pseudolus as reading a passionate letter from the courtesan Phoenicium to his master, Calidorus. Pseudolus and Calidorus offer strikingly different reactions to the letter. Calidorus praises its style and content, but Pseudolus ridicules both—with a string of sexual insults. In this essay I focus upon gender and class as factors in the literary reception of Phoenicium's writing in Plautus' comedy. My discussion compares the writing attributed to Phoenicium with several second century BCE texts by men. In light of these comparisons, I argue that Pseudolus unfairly holds Phoenicium's writing to standards different from those applied to males, and I suggest that social class—that of the critic as well as the writer—played a complex role in the public assessment of what Roman women said and how they said it.

Journal
Advances in the History of Rhetoric
Published
2006-01-01
DOI
10.1080/15362426.2006.10557260
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. “Sex, Lies and Manuscripts: Refiguring Aspasia in the History of Rhetoric.”
    College Composition and Communication  
  2. Fathers and Daughters in Roman Society: Women and the Elite Family.
  3. “Plautine Ingredients in the Performance of the Pseudolus.”
    Classical World  
  4. Prisoner of History. Aspasia of Miletus and her Biographical Tradition.
  5. “At Play with Writing: Letters and Readers in Plautus.”
    Transactions of the American Philological Association  
  6. The Theater of Plautus: Playing to the Audience.
  7. “The Significance of the Name Cerinthus in the Poems of Sulpicia.”
    Transactions of the American Philological Association  
  8. Women Latin Poets: Language, Gender, and Authority from Antiquity to the Eighteenth Century.
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →