Boundaries of Science in an Online Parenting Community

Megan Eatman

doi:10.5744/rhm.2025.2453

Rhetoric of Health and Medicine Aug 2025 Open Access

Boundaries of Science in an Online Parenting Community

Megan Eatman Clemson University

Abstract

While parents have long turned to experts of various kinds for childrearing advice, books like Emily Oster’s Cribsheet suggest that parents can empower themselves by using research on child development to inform their parenting decisions. The online community r/ScienceBasedParenting was designed as a “safe space” for this kind of parental labor, allowing users to request evidence-based advice without the threat of misinformation that often plagues online parenting spaces. This article analyzes how users of this community establish a boundary between science and nonscience, establishing science as an amorphous shared value rather than a set of processes or standards. The community establishes personal feelings and experiences as unscientific and implicitly inferior to “science,” vaguely construed, and user conversations indicate the struggles associated with this construction. The community’s internal rhetoric illustrates that there are limits to the reassurance and empowerment that evidence-based parenting can provide.

Journal: Rhetoric of Health and Medicine
Published: 2025-08-06
DOI: 10.5744/rhm.2025.2453
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: OA PDF Gold
Topics: rhetorical criticism empirical research
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (0)

No references on file for this article.

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Boundaries of Science in an Online Parenting Community

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

References (0)

Related Articles