Concept of Stigma in American Psychiatry
Abstract
This essay presents a rhetorical analysis of how the concept of stigma has functioned in American psychiatric discourse by tracing the concept across nearly two centuries of publications issued by the American Psychiatric Association (APA). Specifically, I analyze how the concept of stigma circulates in discourses that seek to (re)establish psychiatry as a moral and scientific enterprise by managing discontinuities that potentially threaten this desired professional status. These discourses perpetually reconstitute psychiatry’s institutional identity through processes of emplacement, or recurrent spatiotemporal figurations that generate a sense of the present as placed in time. My analysis identifies three spatiotemporal figurations, or chronotopes, that persistently cluster around the concept of stigma as it circulates in psychiatric discourse: emergence, approach, and elevation. These chronotopes establish and maintain psychiatry’s professional identity by recursively (re)orienting the present against stigma, and toward an imminent future characterized by the fulfillment of psychiatry’s scientific and humanitarian mission.
- Journal
- Rhetoric of Health and Medicine
- Published
- 2024-05-15
- DOI
- 10.5744/rhm.2024.2002
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Topics
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
Computers and Composition Jun 2026Christopher McVey; Pary Fassihi; Shuang Geng; Sarah Madsen Hardy; Matthew Parfitt
-
Computers and Composition Jun 2026“Article laundry” or “tutor in pocket?”: Multilingual writers’ generative AI-assisted writing in professional settings ↗Qianqian Zhang-Wu
-
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Apr 2026How to Write With GenAI: A Framework for Using Generative AI to Automate Writing Tasks in Technical Communication ↗Guiseppe Getto; Susan Kelley; Bremen Vance
-
Assessing Writing Apr 2026Associations of adolescents’ argumentative writing scores and growth when evaluated by different human raters and artificial intelligence models ↗Deborah K. Reed; Sterett Mercer
-
Assessing Writing Apr 2026Developing students’ feedback literacy in disciplinary academic writing through generative artificial intelligence ↗Jianda Liu; Zihao Shi; Wanqing Li