The Dialectic of Food Swamps and Clean Food: Ecological Interventions for Disrupting Individualizing Frames of Food Choice
Abstract
Applying an ecological rhetorical approach, this article examines the online circulation of arguments about food choice in two seemingly disparate sites: clean, medicinal food rhetoric and the rhetoric of “food swamps.” Studying snack food conglomerate Mondelez International’s “Mindful Snacking” campaign in juxtaposition with clean eating brand Sakara Life’s “made-for-Instagram” marketing materials demonstrates how clean, medicinal food texts emerge as acts of communicative resistance to the normalization of fast and processed food, yet slip back into the same meritocratic logic emphasizing individual responsibility and ultimately reproduce the ideological conditions that maintain inequitable access to healthy food. This article concludes with suggestions for disrupting and transforming the pervasive individualizing frameworks of food choice that locate health and diet concerns in the individual as opposed to the wider political, economic, and environmental context.
- Journal
- Rhetoric of Health and Medicine
- Published
- 2022-01-18
- DOI
- 10.5744/rhm.2021.2005
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- OA PDF Gold
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Computers and Composition Jun 2026Navigating platform algorithms: Global south feminist activists’ rhetorical and composition practices in digital advocacy on social media ↗Kalpana Shrestha
-
Argumentation Feb 2026Keren Sadoun-Kerber
-
Res Rhetorica Jan 2026Agnieszka Kampka
-
Res Rhetorica Jan 2026Anna M. Kiełbiewska
-
Pedagogy Jan 2026