Abstract

This study employs a quantitative content analysis to investigate how reputation-restoring crisis responses (i.e., denial, diminishment, and apology) from organizations and public figures are verbalized. In addition, this study examines if distinct crisis response strategies are systematically associated with particular language categories (i.e., language abstraction, uncertain language, passive voice, and emotional language). By analyzing 179 audiovisual crisis messages (e.g., press conference broadcasts, television interviews, social media videos), this study shows that denials are generally expressed in the most concrete way (i.e., precise numbers), diminish strategies in the most uncertain way (i.e., hedges), and apologies are the most emotionally charged, primarily referring to the emotions of sadness and shame. These findings highlight the significant role of language in crisis communication and help practitioners in the field to become aware of key linguistic features that could influence the effectiveness of a crisis message.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2024-10-22
DOI
10.1177/23294906241286141
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 75 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/0893318995008003002
  2. 10.1177/1080569913482575
  3. 10.1002/mar.20071
  4. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.01.001
  5. 10.1080/00913367.2013.846241
  6. 10.1016/S0363-8111(97)90023-0
  7. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.10.011
  8. 10.1177/0893318917722635
  9. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101975
  10. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
  11. 10.1177/1080569912461171
  12. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00344.x
  13. 10.1177/0261927X04273034
  14. 10.1177/0261927X19860870
  15. 10.5465/amr.2013.0027
  16. 10.1177/0149206316680030
  17. 10.1177/1075547020908598
  18. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102226
  19. 10.1080/10627260802557506
  20. 10.1111/jcom.12122
  21. 10.1080/00909882.2013.806991
  22. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.05.004
  23. 10.1080/1062726X.2016.1261703
  24. 10.1177/0261927X211045724
  25. 10.1177/0893318904273688
  26. 10.1177/0893318995008004003
  27. 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
  28. 10.1177/089331802237233
  29. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.06.004
  30. 10.1177/0093650217692911
  31. 10.1002/9781119678953.ch24
  32. 10.1177/0261927X221108120
  33. 10.1002/9781119678953.ch3
  34. 10.1037/amp0000620
  35. Fineman S., Gabriel Y. (2010). Apologies and remorse in organizations: Saying sorry—and meaning it? Advanced …
  36. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.07.007
  37. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102356
  38. 10.1177/0146167210386238
  39. 10.1177/0261927X95141004
  40. 10.1017/9781108954587
  41. 10.5465/amj.2018.1417
  42. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101909
  43. 10.1057/s41599-020-00701-w
  44. 10.1075/la.192
  45. 10.1057/s41299-017-0022-7
  46. 10.1177/2329488418804044
  47. 10.1080/15205436.2015.1066013
  48. 10.1177/2329488418777037
  49. 10.1177/0093650208324266
  50. 10.1177/1077699015607338
  51. 10.1080/00909882.2010.536844
  52. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.03.003
  53. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
  54. 10.1080/1062726X.2016.1166367
  55. 10.2307/256443
  56. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00297.x
  57. 10.1177/23294884221106999
  58. 10.4135/9781071802878
  59. 10.1080/13527266.2014.966478
  60. 10.1002/smj.2733
  61. 10.1177/108056990306600103
  62. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.04.007
  63. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.020
  64. 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90022-8
  65. 10.1080/00909880600769944
  66. 10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.558
  67. 10.1080/00913367.1995.10673468
  68. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101841
  69. 10.1177/0893318994007003004
  70. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.05.003
  71. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.03.004
  72. 10.1080/0163853X.2019.1576471
  73. 10.1177/2329488417702475
  74. 10.1080/15205436.2023.2197884
  75. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102208
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →