Managing in Writing: Recommendations from Textual Patterns in Managers’ Email Communication

Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska ; Dorota Molek-Winiarska Wroclaw University of Economics and Business

Abstract

This study draws from personality psychology and linguistics of written communication to explore the characteristics of self-selected well-written email communications (N=273) solicited from Polish managers who organized and supervised the (remote) work of their units during the COVID-19 period. The focus is on the writing of managers with above-average levels of conscientiousness and agreeableness, as these personality factors are predictors of efficacy in the completion of two work-related goals, Achievement and Communion, according to the Theory of Purposeful Work Behavior. The linguistic patterns responsible for effective email communication are identified through both automated and qualitative textual analyses of the email sample. The study has implications for management training via the assumption that linguistic patterns that a reflexive manager uses in writing are subjected to monitoring and can be modeled and adapted to. Specific recommendations for managerial writing styles concern informational, instructional, explanatory, feedback, and query messages.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2023-09-01
DOI
10.1177/23294906221137860
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Green
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (61)

  1. Agbi R. O. (2018). Leadership communications strategies for enhancing virtual team performance. Walden Disser…
  2. Reflexive leadership: Organising in an imperfect world
  3. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.018
  4. The social animal
  5. 10.1177/1742715020917819
Show all 61 →
  1. 10.1080/08959285.2012.736900
  2. 10.1037/a0038278
  3. 10.5465/amr.2010.0479
  4. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101351
  5. 10.1177/2329488415597516
  6. 10.1037/a0037464
  7. 10.1007/s10111-019-00592-1
  8. 10.1108/13563281311294100
  9. 10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02064.x
  10. 10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.343
  11. 10.1080/14697017.2021.1917489
  12. 10.1177/1052562904264440
  13. 10.1080/08824090802637098
  14. 10.5271/sjweh.653
  15. 10.1177/0093650211413571
  16. 10.1007/s10869-009-9140-2
  17. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace
  18. 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1096
  19. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005
  20. 10.1080/13678868.2020.1780078
  21. 10.1111/ijmr.12095
  22. 10.1177/1742715020935748
  23. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration
  24. 10.1002/smi.2792
  25. 10.1016/j.chb.2007.09.001
  26. 10.1007/s10551-019-04220-w
  27. 10.1080/08824096.2014.963219
  28. 10.1037/a0030264
  29. 10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.009
  30. John O. P., Srivastava S. (1999). The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspect…
  31. 10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.751
  32. 10.1080/14697017.2021.1861721
  33. 10.12921/cmst.2018.0000005
  34. 10.1080/14778238.2021.1877579
  35. 10.1080/1359432X.2015.1005608
  36. 10.1177/0021943610385656
  37. 10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.010
  38. 10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5
  39. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management
  40. 10.1348/096317908X325313
  41. 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107172
  42. 10.1080/08959285.2016.1157596
  43. 10.1080/10904018.2012.712810
  44. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.008
  45. Ruiller C., Van Der Heijden B., Chedotel F., Dumas M. (2019). “You have got a friend”: The value of perceived…
  46. 10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.022
  47. 10.4324/9781315237473
  48. 10.1080/10904018.2016.1202770
  49. 10.4324/9780203594070
  50. 10.1080/26437015.2021.1944793
  51. 10.1177/2329488414525456
  52. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007
  53. 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2020.100784
  54. 10.1080/10429247.2020.1733380
  55. Leadership in organizations
  56. Zawadzki B., Strelau J., Szczepaniak P. Śliwińska M. (1998). Inwentarz Osobowości NEO-FFI Costy i McCrae. Pra…