Deborah Hicks

2 articles
University of Delaware

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Hicks

Deborah Hicks's work travels primarily in Rhetoric (100% of indexed citations) · 1 indexed citations.

By cluster

  • Rhetoric — 1

Top citing journals

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. Back to Oz? Rethinking the Literary in a Critical Study of Reading1
    Abstract

    Drawing on data gathered during a fourteen-month study of reading practices among poor and working-class girls, this essay explores the challenges of creating a responsive and critical reading pedagogy across boundaries of class. Set largely in a summer and after-school reading program for pre-teen girls, the study addressed the question of how a pedagogy centered around literature might accord the possibility for girls to read, speak, and value in more than one class-specific voice. The complexities of creating such a critical reading project are explored through narratives that chronicle the interplay of the material, the psychological, and the discursive in girls’ textual preferences and literary responses. Assuming the dual voice of teacher and ethnographer, the author argues for a new poetics of inquiry that can convey the nuanced complexities of reading, voice, and psychological experience among girls growing up in working-poor America.

    doi:10.58680/rte20044462
  2. Working through Discourse Genres in School
    Abstract

    Explores possible benefits of placing considerations of genre as more central to dialogs and debates about language arts education. Aims for a theoretical framework emphasizing the responsive and agentive engagement of students working through disciplinary literacies. Considers ways in which one first-grade teacher helped a non-middle-class learner to engage more deeply with science discourse genres.

    doi:10.58680/rte19973891