Elizabeth Kalbfleisch

3 articles
James Madison University ORCID: 0009-0007-9260-5443

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Kalbfleisch

Elizabeth Kalbfleisch's work travels primarily in Composition & Writing Studies (66% of indexed citations) · 3 total indexed citations from 2 clusters.

By cluster

  • Composition & Writing Studies — 2
  • Rhetoric — 1

Top citing journals

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. Symposium
    Abstract

    This symposium brings together a range of scholars to consider what economic forces have driven the development of independent writing programs, and how such programs are susceptible to economic conditions and pressures, perhaps even more so than neighboring disciplines in the humanities.

    doi:10.58680/ccc201628760
  2. ImitatioReconsidered
    Abstract

    This article explores the emphasis on reading instruction in the classical pedagogical technique of imitatio. It briefly surveys scholarship in literary and composition studies to trace a short history of this pedagogy before turning to contemporary descriptions of reading pedagogy and showing how imitatio interacts with such practices.

    doi:10.1215/15314200-3158605
  3. Anxieties of Legitimacy: The Origins and Influence of the “Classicist Stance” in American Rhetoric Studies
    Abstract

    ABSTRACT This article describes an origin of the “classicist stance,” Nan Johnson's term for the emphasis on the classical past in American rhetoric historiography. It argues that adherence to the classical past arises from an anxiety about conducting research evident in the field in the early twentieth century, an anxiety that develops into fears about institutional legitimacy later in the century. The article closes by urging scholars of rhetoric in the modern era to embrace print modernity as their researh framework, rather than classicism.

    doi:10.1080/15362426.2013.764833