I. HASHIMOTO

8 articles

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads HASHIMOTO

I. HASHIMOTO's work travels primarily in Rhetoric (50% of indexed citations) · 6 total indexed citations from 4 clusters.

By cluster

  • Rhetoric — 3
  • Technical Communication — 1
  • Other / unclustered — 1
  • Composition & Writing Studies — 1

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. Software review
    Abstract

    PROFESSOR'S HELPER (version 3.21). Michael Crumm. Dubuque, IA: Program Associates, 1987. ($39.95)

    doi:10.1080/07350198909388887
  2. Writers on Writing
    doi:10.2307/358149
  3. Voice as Juice: Some Reservations about Evangelic Composition
    Abstract

    When teachers talk about the good qualities of student writing, one of their favorite terms is voice. Good student writing has it; bad student writing doesn't. Voice is sometimes a sign of control, of ethos, of style. It is often associated with persona or mask. But it is also often associated with something Peter Elbow in Writing with Power calls juice-a combination of magic potion, mother's milk, and electricity (286). When we read writing that has this juice, we feel the pulse of a writer churning over the facts the world presents (Ruszkiewicz, Well Bound Words 67); we sense the energy, humor, individuality, music, rhythm, pace, flow, surprise, believability (Murray, Write to Learn 144); we hear the voice of a real person speaking to real people (Lannon, The Writing Process 14). And while this voice-as-juice seems to have gained a considerable amount of respectability lately, it brings with it a kind of evangelical zeal that may not do us any good at all.

    doi:10.2307/357588
  4. Assignments that work
    doi:10.1080/07350198609359125
  5. The Myth of the Attention-Getting Opener
    Abstract

    Although textbooks emphasize the importance of attention-getting introductions, such devices are hard to explain and hard for students to recognize. Perhaps even more important, such an emphasis may suggest to students a vastly oversimplified view of the reading process.

    doi:10.1177/0741088386003001009
  6. Persuasion as ethical argument
    Abstract

    You are, at the least, obliged not to be ignorant, not to be dogmatic, not to be arrogant. You must explain fully, offer carefully collected evidence, and reason logically. You must disavow coercion, manipulation, and image-making. You must welcome, not threaten; disclose, not deceive; be generous, not hostile. You must, in your argument, make a common world, with room in it for yourself and your reader. (231)

    doi:10.1080/07350198509359104
  7. Comment and Response
    Abstract

    Preview this article: Comment and Response, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/46/3/collegeenglish13380-1.gif

    doi:10.58680/ce198413380
  8. Toward a Taxonomy of Scholarly Publication
    Abstract

    Preview this article: Toward a Taxonomy of Scholarly Publication, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/45/5/collegeenglish13625-1.gif

    doi:10.58680/ce198313625