Jessica McCaughey

3 articles
George Washington University ORCID: 0000-0002-5217-1181
  1. Model as Missed Opportunity for Writing Transfer During Career Change
    Abstract

    This article draws on narratives of 45 career-change professionals and explores the use of models as onboarding tools through the lens of writing transfer and the crucial rhetorical thinking and metacognition that it requires. These interviews show that the use of models often limits the opportunity for writing transfer for these professionals by deemphasizing the “invention” phase while they learn to write new documents in their new workplaces. The article argues that invention, rooted in rhetorical thinking, in the workplace can be a prompt for writing transfer, which is often difficult for new communicators in professional settings. The author suggests ways to position students as advocates of invention-related practices in their future workplaces, so that writing transfer might happen more seamlessly.

    doi:10.1177/07410883251372211
  2. Update Culture and the Afterlife of Digital Writing
    Abstract

    In the introduction to Update Culture and the Afterlife of Digital Writing, author John R. Gallagher recalls the project’s spark coming from an interview he conducted with a blogger who casually me...

    doi:10.1080/10572252.2021.1915059
  3. The Rhetoric of Online Exclusive Pumping Communities: Tactical Technical Communication as Eschewing Judgment
    Abstract

    ABSTRACT “Exclusive Pumping” straddles the most common infant-feeding methods: breastfeeding and bottle feeding. Exclusive pumpers express milk and feed with bottles. Yet experts rarely recommend exclusive pumping, creating a need for information outside of formal communication outlets. This article argues that exclusive pumping forums are sites of tactical technical communication – operating as “anti-institutional” – and explores these forums as places of inspiration and support, as well as spaces where mothers seek to solve technical feeding problems while avoiding institutional judgment.

    doi:10.1080/10572252.2020.1823485