Josh Chase

2 articles
University of Louisiana at Monroe

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Chase

Josh Chase's work travels primarily in Composition & Writing Studies (100% of indexed citations) · 3 indexed citations.

By cluster

  • Composition & Writing Studies — 3

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. Han Yu and Jonathan Buehl, eds.
    Abstract

    Since 1976, when Raymond Williams published Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society, “keywords” books have become a staple resource for knowledge workers in the humanities, offering short essays on frequently used terms within a given field. At least two such texts exist in composition (Keywords in Writing Studies and Keywords in Composition Studies), and in the past year, we have seen the publication of two books aimed at technical and professional communication (TPC): Keywords in Design Thinking and Keywords in Technical and Professional Communication. The latter book is the subject of this review. Edited by Han Yu and Jonathan Buehl, Keywords in Technical and Professional Communication should be of interest to TPC specialists in both industry and academia, as well as to any engineer interested in learning about how communication mediates their field. The purpose of the book is not just to define terms. Rather, it aims to trace the disciplinary contexts and sketch possible futures for terms that have informed and continue to shape the field of TPC. In Keywords, Yu and Buehl gather some of the field’s most prominent and thoughtprovoking researchers, each of them offering insightful commentaries about an array of topics and focus areas.

    doi:10.1109/tpc.2023.3322597
  2. Monstrous Composition: Reanimating the Lecture in First-Year Writing Instruction
    Abstract

    This article reports on one university’s experiment in resurrecting and reanimating the composition lecture, a one-hundred-plus student section dubbed “MonsterComp,” including the process, outcomes, and lessons learned. Although this restructuring of the first-year composition course was partially motivated by administrative pressures, the main motivation behind this experiment was to enhance teacher training and support while still retaining the workshop environment and low student-to-instructor ratio of traditional composition sections. The course involves multiple stakeholders, including the WPA and graduate student program coordinators, graduate student instructors, and course-based coaches from our university's writing center. Assessment of student work, observations of the course, and surveys administered to stakeholders indicate that the course was successful in terms of teacher training and preserving student learning outcomes.

    doi:10.58680/ccc202030728