Joshua DiCaglio

3 articles
Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University ORCID: 0000-0002-9526-1507

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads DiCaglio

Joshua DiCaglio's work travels primarily in Rhetoric (100% of indexed citations) · 1 indexed citations.

By cluster

  • Rhetoric — 1

Top citing journals

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. Parsing the Scalar Situation: Lithium and the Analysis of Concurrent Epistemologies
    doi:10.1080/02773945.2025.2546813
  2. Wikipedia as Editorial Microcosm: Stalled Wikipedia Articles and the Teaching of Applied Comprehensive Editing
    Abstract

    Instructors have used Wikipedia to teach information literacy, composition, and as a supplement to the study of a specific topic. This webtext aims to lower the barriers-to-entry for using Wikipedia in advanced editing courses by providing an extensive overview and documentation through examples of the issues involved and a series of educational materials for both instructors and students.

  3. Language and the Logic of Subjectivity: Whitehead and Burke in Crisis
    Abstract

    ABSTRACT This article examines the meaning of the subjective in rhetorical modes of inquiry in contrast to the other-oriented nature of social critique. I reopen the problem of consciousness for interpretation by examining challenges to scientific authority in the 1930s, specifically how Kenneth Burke and Alfred North Whitehead respond to a “crisis in mathematics” born out of Whitehead's attempt, with Bertrand Russell, to reconcile logic and mathematics. Whitehead uses Russell's paradox to demonstrate the necessary return of subjective inquiry as a legitimate mode of knowledge. Burke's Permanence and Change develops Whitehead's arguments to justify interpretative approaches to knowledge. Examining their arguments reveals an analogous “crisis in the humanities” in which language or culture is substituted for the examination of subjectivity. Such misplaced concreteness risks omitting interpretive aspects of rhetorical inquiry in favor of the social or political when such social aspects only emerge within the field of subjective experience.

    doi:10.5325/philrhet.50.1.0096