Julia Voss

4 articles

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Voss

Julia Voss's work travels primarily in Composition & Writing Studies (100% of indexed citations) · 1 indexed citations.

By cluster

  • Composition & Writing Studies — 1

Top citing journals

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. Lecture, Discussion, Group Work, Repeat: Using Aerial Photography and Machine Learning to Study the Use of Writing-Related Pedagogies in STEM Courses and Their Impact on Different Student Subgroups
    doi:10.37514/atd-j.2022.19.1-2.07
  2. Researching Writing Program Administration Expertise in Action: A Case Study of Collaborative Problem Solving as Transdisciplinary Practice
    Abstract

    Theorizing WPA expertise as problem-oriented, stakeholder-inclusive practice, we apply the twenty-first-century paradigm of transdisciplinarity to a campus WID Initiative to read and argue that data-driven research capturing transdisciplinary WPA methods in action will allow us to better understand, represent, and leverage rhetoric-composition/writing studies’ disciplinary expertise in twenty-first-century higher education.

    doi:10.58680/ccc201929990
  3. "Our Doors is Always Open": Aligning Literacy Learning Practices in Writing Programs and Residential Learning Communities
    doi:10.37514/atd-j.2016.13.4.17
  4. To Teach, Critique, and Compose: Representing Computers and Composition through the CIWIC/DMAC Institute
    Abstract

    This article examines how the Computers in Writing-Intensive Classrooms (CIWIC)/Digital Media and Composition (DMAC) Institute has realized founding director Cynthia L. Selfe's commitment to prioritizing people first, then teaching, then technology. I analyze how institute curricula introduce and model pedagogies for teaching digital composing, foster networking among participants, articulate a critical stance toward technology, and encourage newcomers to enter the field as administrators and scholars (as well as teachers). I also draw on participant documents (social media posts, publications, and CVs) to investigate the uptake of these ideas. Moving forward, I suggest that in light of the institute's growing emphasis on digital composing, 1) knowledge-making should be seen as the larger frame for CIWIC/DMAC work, and 2) research should be added to the institute's existing articulation of the field in terms of people→teaching→technology.

    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2015.04.003