MARILYN S. STERNGLASS

15 articles

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads STERNGLASS

MARILYN S. STERNGLASS's work travels primarily in Rhetoric (75% of indexed citations) · 8 total indexed citations from 2 clusters.

By cluster

  • Rhetoric — 6
  • Composition & Writing Studies — 2

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. THE CHANGING PERCEPTION OF THE ROLE OF WRITING:
  2. Grades, Time, and the Curse of Course
    doi:10.2307/359043
  3. Writing Development as Seen through Longitudinal Research: A Case Study Exemplar
    Abstract

    This article presents insights about writing development of urban college students that can be gleaned from longitudinal research that examines both personal and academic histories. Factors in students' lives, revealed through ongoing interviews and classroom observations, influence both students' abilities to respond to certain types of reading and writing tasks and their potential to develop as successful college students. A set of categories developed by Larson is used to analyze the texts produced by a basic writing student in her first 3½ years of college to illustrate the richness and complexity of analysis available through longitudinal research.

    doi:10.1177/0741088393010002004
  4. Composing and the Question of Agency
    doi:10.2307/377895
  5. The Presence of Thought: Introspective Accounts of Reading and Writing
    doi:10.2307/358086
  6. Facts, Artifacts and Counterfacts: Theory and Method for a Reading and Writing Course
    Abstract

    This is a book about reading, writing, and teaching and the ways each can be imagined as composition. The authors bring together eight years of teaching and research connected with the integrated basic reading and writing course developed at the University of Pittsburgh. The approach offered here--widely discussed in professional journals--has been tested at several universities, as well as at the high school level.

    doi:10.2307/357764
  7. Retrospective Accounts of Language and Learning Processes
    Abstract

    A group of graduate students in English and language education were given a series of instructor-designed and self-designed reading and writing tasks. They wrote formal papers in response to these tasks and kept retrospective journals describing their reading and writing strategies. The study looks at the nature of introspective accounts and the usefulness of such accounts in studies of the composing process. Several writing tasks are described and analyzed, and three brief case studies are presented. The study concludes that retrospective journal accounts are a rich source of information because they permit consideration of the complex context within which composing occurs.

    doi:10.1177/0741088386003003002
  8. Assessing Reading, Writing, and Reasoning
    Abstract

    Preview this article: Assessing Reading, Writing, and Reasoning, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/43/3/collegeenglish13812-1.gif

    doi:10.58680/ce198113812
  9. Understanding the Structure of English
    doi:10.2307/356784
  10. Composition Teacher as Reading Teacher
    Abstract

    Preview this article: Composition Teacher as Reading Teacher, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ccc/27/4/collegecompositionandcommunication16555-1.gif

    doi:10.58680/ccc197616555
  11. An Introduction to Linguistics
    doi:10.2307/356178
  12. Dialect Literature: Positive Reinforcer for Writing "In" and "Out" of Dialect
    doi:10.2307/357118
  13. Dialect Features in the Compositions of Black and White College Students: The Same or Different?
    Abstract

    Preview this article: Dialect Features in the Compositions of Black and White College Students: The Same or Different?, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ccc/25/4/collegecompositionandcommunication17197-1.gif

    doi:10.58680/ccc197417197
  14. Comment on O'Neil and Sledd
    doi:10.2307/374915
  15. Comment and Rebuttal
    Abstract

    Preview this article: Comment and Rebuttal, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/34/8/collegeenglish17748-1.gif

    doi:10.58680/ce197317748