Mary M. Garrett

3 articles
The Ohio State University

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Garrett

Mary M. Garrett's work travels primarily in Rhetoric (100% of indexed citations) · 3 indexed citations.

By cluster

  • Rhetoric — 3

Top citing journals

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. “What Need is There of Words?” The Rhetoric of Lű's Annals (Lűshi chunqiu)
    Abstract

    This essay introduces Lű's Annals (Lűshi chunqiu), a classical Chinese text with a wealth of material on rhetoric. Not only does the text evaluate numerous examples of persuasion and sophistry, it also lays out a system of rhetorical precepts grounded in a distinctive ontology, that of correlative cosmology. After outlining the cosmology, epistemology, and theory of language of Lű's Annals, I trace how these shape its rhetorical theory and practices. I then consider how the text itself works as a persuasive artifact in the light of its own strictures. The essay closes with some reflections on why this valuable resource for Classical Chinese rhetoric has been neglected.

    doi:10.1525/rh.2012.30.4.354
  2. "What Need is There of Words?": The Rhetoric of Lű’s Annals (Lűshi chunqiu)
    Abstract

    This essay introduces Lű's Annals (Lűshi chunqiu), a classical Chinese text with a wealth of material on rhetoric. Not only does the text evaluate numerous examples of persuasion and sophistry, it also lays out a system of rhetorical precepts grounded in a distinctive ontology, that of correlative cosmology. After outlining the cosmology, epistemology, and theory of language of Lű's Annals, I trace how these shape its rhetorical theory and practices. I then consider how the text itself works as a persuasive artifact in the light of its own strictures. The essay closes with some reflections on why this valuable resource for Classical Chinese rhetoric has been neglected.

    doi:10.1353/rht.2012.0001
  3. Chinese Buddhist Religious Disputation
    doi:10.1023/a:1007747017533