This study investigates the effects of case and traditional assignments on the writing products and processes of community college students. Specifically, each of 57 first-year business students in three sections of a business composition course wrote in response to either (a) two traditional assignments, (b) two short case scenario assignments, or (c) two lengthy, elaborated case assignments. Participants' letters were scored using a performance criteria rating scale for determining both overall quality and specific trait quality. Results indicate that the case assignments generally produced more effective writing products than did traditional paradigm assignments. Results also indicate that the elaborated case assignments generally produced better writing products than did the short case scenarios. However, results also suggest that the writing of participants who already possess business-related experience was not as affected by assignment type as the writing of inexperienced participants. Finally, qualitative measures suggest that the writing processes and attitudes of participants. completing the case assignments were highly sensitive to audience and context, whereas the processes and attitudes of participants completing the traditional assignments were highly sensitive to organization, format, and correctness.

The goal of this study was to expand our understanding of mentoring situated within electronic exchanges. Focusing on three graduate and five undergraduate mentors’ responses via telecommunications, we explored the strategies mentors used to make their reading and understanding of the texts explicit to their students, the responses mentors provided to demonstrate how students might revise, and mentors’ perceptions toward mentoring. Mentors responded to eight drafts from 24 ninth-grade students over an eight-week period, generating an average of 20 comments per student draft. Data collected included response grids of each mentor’s comments to students, interviews with mentors midway and at the end of the study, and journals kept by the mentors. Results showed that mentor pre-project expectations about responses they might make to students did not correspond to their actual responses, and that as the project progressed, mentor responses formed patterns corresponding to the draft of the students’ writing assignment. Additional differences were found based on mentors’ previous teaching experience, gender, and requests for feedback. Mentors expressed as their greatest difficulty not knowing which comments were perceived by students as most helpful

Preview this article: Some Characteristics of Memorable Expository Writing: Effects of Revisions by Writers with Different Backgrounds, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/rte/22/3/researchintheteachingofenglish15543-1.gif

Preview this article: Practical Problems of the Beginning Researcher, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/rte/10/1/researchintheteachingofenglish20045-1.gif

Preview this article: The 1974 Conference on Research in English Education and Reading, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/rte/10/1/researchintheteachingofenglish20043-1.gif

Preview this article: Report on the NCTE Committee on Research: The 1973 Conference on Research in English Education and Reading: Notes on the Training of Future Researchers, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/rte/8/2/researchintheteachingofenglish20084-1.gif

Preview this article: An Experience Preserved: The Video Tapes of the Minnesota-NCTE Seminar, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/rte/7/2/researchintheteachingofenglish20126-1.gif