Pam Bromley

10 articles
Kansas State University

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Bromley

Pam Bromley's work travels primarily in Composition & Writing Studies (100% of indexed citations) · 1 indexed citations.

By cluster

  • Composition & Writing Studies — 1

Top citing journals

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. From the Special Issue Editors
    doi:10.7771/2832-9414.1890
  2. An Introduction to Transatlantic Writing Center Resources
    doi:10.7771/2832-9414.1891
  3. The State of Writing Center Research Across the Atlantic: A Bibliometric Analysis of a German Flagship Journal, 2010-2016
  4. From the Editors
    Abstract

    To our readers in 2020: we hope you are not experiencing inordinate loss. We write this introduction in the midst of multiple events resonant with historical import-and with the possibility for positive, lasting change: worldwide protests for racial justice, the U.S. Supreme Court decision against job discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity, and significant attempts to save lives and jobs in the face of the ongoing pandemic. Amidst these events, of course, we are all engaged in conversations exploring how education will need to adapt.

    doi:10.7771/2832-9414.1918
  5. From the Editors
    doi:10.7771/2832-9414.1873
  6. From the Editors
    doi:10.7771/2832-9414.1863
  7. Review: Strategies for Writing Center Research, by Jackie Grutsch McKinney
    doi:10.7771/2832-9414.1824
  8. Transfer and Dispositions in Writing Centers: A Cross-institutional Mixed-methods Study
    doi:10.37514/atd-j.2016.13.1.01
  9. A Model for Facilitating Peer Review in the STEM Disciplines: A Case Study of Peer Review Workshops Supporting Student Writing in Introductory Biology Courses
    Abstract

    Over the last seven years, I have spent time across three continents talking to scientists and mathematicians about their beliefs and attitudes and experiences related to writing in their respective disciplines.I have been impressed by the passion and insight with which most have talked about writing and its relationship to critical thinking, and I have often been surprised by how they engage in these practices.For example, rather than working from an a priori hypothesis, many researchers in the STEM disciplines compose backwards, from the results to the introduction.And when reading, many seem to move from the middle of a paper outwards, beginning with the results and method, using an extremely critical eye, and then perhaps scanning out to the introduction and the discussion, or dispensing with these sections altogether.Over and over again, I heard this same story from different scientists, as if it were a secret each alone had stumbled upon.In addition, collaboration, conversation and peer review are very much part of the language of composition that takes place in the sciences (co-authorship, the hierarchies of disciplinary or interdisciplinary teams, the drafting process and the use of technology), but we who work in WID (writing in the disciplines) and WAC (writing across the curriculum) programs are constantly challenged: "How do we teach process in ways that are disciplinarily appropriate?"Historically, we haven't done this well.As Burton and Morgan observed on the training of mathematicians as writers,

    doi:10.37514/dbh-j.2014.2.1.06
  10. How Important Is the Local, Really? A Cross-Institutional Quantitative Assessment of Frequently Asked Questions in Writing Center Exit Surveys
    doi:10.7771/2832-9414.1755