The authors define midrash and explain its importance as a Jewish rhetorical practice, focusing on how two particular examples of midrash deal with the deity’s response to the destruction of the Temple.

In my 1992 College English article “The Ethic of Expediency: Classical Rhetoric, Technology, and the Holocaust” [1], I looked at the implications of a Nazi memo whose sole purpose was to improve the efficiency of the gassing vans, in order to begin to try to understand and discuss the negative uses and ethical abuses to which technical communication, and deliberative rhetoric generally, could be taken by the powerful and unscrupulous. In “Questioning the Motives of Technical Communication and Rhetoric: Steven Katz's ‘Ethic of Expediency’” [2], Patrick Moore accuses me of ignoring alternate translations, citing out of context, and focusing on the negative meaning of words to make my case. The point at issue in these charges, I believe, is whether (and to what degree) Aristotle meant to base deliberative discourse on “expediency.” I will take each of these charges up one at a time to explore them more thoroughly, discuss their interrelations, and then conclude with a few observations of my own.

This article analyzes the clinical protocol within the rhetorical framework of the drug development and approval process, identifying the constraints under which the protocol is written and the rhetorical form, argumentative strategies, and style needed to improve and teach the writing of this document.

Technical-professional communication as praxis, or social action, is extended beyond skill or amoral art into the realm of phronesis, concerned with reasoning about ends rather than means. However, praxis and phronesis are sociologically constructed and, like social-epistemic rhetoric, ideologically defined in the political context by the ethic of expediency enabling deliberative rhetoric. Hitler's use of propaganda to construct praxis and define phronesis in Nazi Germany is examined in terms of the rational but open-ended nature of Aristotle's political-ethical thought, and the implications for our understanding of Aristotelian praxis is discussed. Finally, the failure of professional discourse surrounding the siting of a low-level nuclear waste facility to create a persuasive reality and yet ideologically construct praxis is examined, raising questions concerning the possibility of a deliberative technical rhetoric in U.S. democracy.

Preview this article: Comment & Response, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/54/7/collegeenglish9361-1.gif

Preview this article: The Ethic of Expediency: Classical Rhetoric, Technology, and the Holocaust, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/54/3/collegeenglish9392-1.gif

Tullio Maranhao, Therapeutic Discourse and Socratic Dialogue. University of Wisconsin Series in Rhetoric of the Human Sciences. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1986. J. Max Patrick and Robert O. Evans, eds. with John W. Wallace and R. J. Schoeck. Style, Rhetoric, and Rhythm: Essays by Morris W. Croll. Woodbridge, Connecticut: Ox Bow Press, 1989. Rpt. Princeton University Press, 1966. 450 pp. Stephen M. North. The Making of Knowledge in Composition: Portrait of an Emerging Field. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook Publishers, 1987. 403.