Analyzing Media: Communication Technologies as Symbolic and Cognitive Systems. James W. Chesebro and Dale A. Bertelsen. New York: Guilford, 1996. 228 pages. Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in a Digital World. Ed. Yasmin Kafai and Mitchel Resnick. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996. 339 pages. Narratives and Spaces: Technology and the Construction of American Culture. David E. Nye. New York: Columbia UP, 1997. 224 pages. More Speech, Not Less: Communications Law in the Information Age. Mark Sableman. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois UP, 1997. 277 pages.

Computer-based instruction (CBI) using multimedia and hypermedia is a new approach to teaching that is becoming increasingly popular in academic and nonacademic settings. Because the technical communication profession has developed a disciplinary culture uniquely suited to evolve along with communication technology, technical communicators experienced in creating instructional materials for technical products are well-positioned to become effective designers of this innovative form of instruction. However, as designers, they must become proficient in the early design stages of audience analysis, goals analysis, and control analysis to master multimedia and hypermedia CBI. In this article, the authors review findings from several fields to help technical communication teachers and practitioners (a) explain the value of audience analysis, goals analysis, and control analysis; (b) accomplish those analyses effectively; (c) use the results of their analyses to create effective multimedia or hypermedia CBI; and (d) set priorities for further related research.

Because technical communicators are expected increasingly to participate in environmental communication, technical communication practitioners, researchers, and teachers should be aware of current practices in public environmental debate and related reform movements. This essay uses a controversial case in which a Mohawk community clashes with the Environmental Protection Agency 1) to explore how alternative worldviews affect environmental remediation efforts; and 2) to serve as a template for the development of a feminist perspective on how communicative practices in environmental policy making should be reformed.