Shelley Stagg Peterson

4 articles
University of Toronto ORCID: 0000-0001-6985-5603

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Peterson

Shelley Stagg Peterson's work travels primarily in Rhetoric (40% of indexed citations) · 5 total indexed citations from 3 clusters.

By cluster

  • Rhetoric — 2
  • Composition & Writing Studies — 2
  • Other / unclustered — 1

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. Young children’s written and verbal responses in a dynamic assessment context
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100543
  2. Gender and Literacy Issues and Research: Placing the Spotlight on Writing
    Abstract

    In this introduction to a special issue of the Journal of Writing Research, we review four decades of research, bringing writing to the forefront in conversations devoted to gender and literacy. We identify the impetus for much of the research on gender and writing and situate the four articles in this special issue within three themes: gender patterns in what and how students write, cognitive and socio-cultural factors influencing gender differences in student writing, and attempts to provide alternatives to stereotypical gender patterns in student writing. These interdisciplinary themes, further developed within the four articles, underscore the need to consider gender as a complex social, cognitive and linguistic characteristic of both reading and writing.

    doi:10.17239/jowr-2012.03.03.1
  3. Assessing and providing feedback for student writing in Canadian classrooms
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.05.003
  4. Sixth-Grade Teachers’ Written Comments on Student Writing: Genre and Gender Influences
    Abstract

    This article examines the influence of genre and gender on comments written by 108 sixth-grade teachers in response to two narrative and two persuasive papers. There were significant genre differences. Process, conventions, artistic style, and format were the focus of significantly greater numbers of comments directed to narrative writing. In contrast, meaning, organization, effort, and ideology were emphasized to a greater degree when teachers responded to persuasive writing. Teachers tended to indicate and make greater numbers of corrections and to provide more criticisms and lessons, explanations, and suggestions when the work was attributed to a male writer. Female teachers generally wrote greater numbers of comments and tended to indicate and make more corrections. Generally, teachers were reluctant to engage with the ideologies in students’ writing. There was a correlation between convention errors and the number and types of comments.

    doi:10.1177/0741088305282762