Susan Zickmund

2 articles

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

  1. Deliberation, Phrônesis, and Authenticity: Heidegger's Early Conception of Rhetoric
    Abstract

    Research Article| January 01 2007 Deliberation, Phrônesis, and Authenticity: Heidegger's Early Conception of Rhetoric Susan Zickmund Susan Zickmund Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2007) 40 (4): 406–415. https://doi.org/10.2307/25655289 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Susan Zickmund; Deliberation, Phrônesis, and Authenticity: Heidegger's Early Conception of Rhetoric. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2007; 40 (4): 406–415. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/25655289 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2007 The Pennsylvania State University2007The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

    doi:10.2307/25655289
  2. Constructing Political Identity: Religious Radicalism and the Rhetoric of the Iranian Revolution
    Abstract

    1 In the ashen smoke of airliners crashing, glass shattering, and steel evaporating, visions of internationalism and safety become difficult to see. Bright images of progress and globalism yield to clouds of terror and trouble. Radical Muslims have declared war on America: this "fact," the pictures of Muslims cheering Osama Bin Laden, and the celebratory gestures of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein crowded out images of mourning Arabs. Photographs of Yassir Arafat giving blood to help the New York City victims got little play. After the terrorist attacks of 9/11, Samuel Huntington's oft-challenged claim of an inevitable Clash of Civilizations (1996) between a Muslim East and a Christian West swung back into fashion. 2 In pronouncing this rupture between East and West, media commentators often name the Iranian Revolution as the first fullblown demonstration of Islamist radicalism. Revolutionary discourse from the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1930s and from activist Sayyid Qutb in Egypt predated the Iran Revolution. Yet events in Iran involved a prophetic discourse that discounted Arab leaders as infidels and indicted Western society as corrupt. When Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda echoed these charges, the Ayatollah Khomeini, the Iranian Revolution, and the seizure of American hostages emerged as the first figures of Islamic unrest recognized by most Americans. Together these form much of the background that popular media cite for the Attack on America. 3 The rhetorical fount of Islamist ideology in Iran was the Ayatollah Khomeini. Through Friday sermons and occasional writings, he discredited the U.S.-imposed monarchy of the Shah as illegitimate. Widely read in revolutionary Iran, his treatise on Islamic Government ( Velayat-e Faqih) has become the foundation for the post-revolutionary society. Rose portrays Khomeini as the one figure responsible for "the restructuring of the personal and social consciousness of Muslims into an

    doi:10.13008/2151-2957.1048