Suzette Haden Elgin

6 articles

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Elgin

Suzette Haden Elgin's work travels primarily in Technical Communication (100% of indexed citations) · 1 indexed citations.

By cluster

  • Technical Communication — 1

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. Suzette Haden Elgin Responds
    doi:10.2307/376702
  2. Comment and Response
    doi:10.58680/ce198313597
  3. The Top Forty Mistakes in English Usage: A Bulletin
    Abstract

    Preview this article: The Top Forty Mistakes in English Usage: A Bulletin, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/44/5/collegeenglish13707-1.gif

    doi:10.58680/ce198213707
  4. Don’t No Revolutions Hardly Ever Come by Here
    Abstract

    Preview this article: Don't No Revolutions Hardly Ever Come by Here, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/39/7/collegeenglish16159-1.gif

    doi:10.58680/ce197816159
  5. Don't No Revolutions Hardly Ever Come by Here
    Abstract

    WHEN W. NELSON FRANCIS said that, he didn't have it in mind to fun nobody. For sure there was no way he could have knowed, twenty years ahead of time, that his words would look like something meant for a bitter joke today. The revolution he was talking about (using structuralist linguistics to teach English) hasn't happened vet, to begin with. And to go on with, another one-generative transformational linguistics-has come along in the meantime and turned out about as useful to a teacher as a rubber crutch. The structuralists and the transformationalists haven't either one of them come up with the sweeping consequences Francis was so sure about. Structural linguistics gets used mostly in foreign language classes; and transformational grammar, in spite of two three papers saying that it might could be a little bit of use after all, has swept right into and right back out of English classes, leaving precious little behind itmaybe a good word or two said for sentence-combining exercises.1 There was the Roberts English Series, poor sorry thing, that no doubt meant well; all it did in the long run was teach a whole generation of English teachers to despise transformational grammar forevermore. Chomsky himself, they'll tell you, said T-grammar had no place in anybody's English class, and they're with him on that; by now you won't hear much else said on the subject amongst teachers. Seeing as how all this is true, it's purely radical of me to say that I disagree with all that; it's radicaller yet to say I think I can prove I'm right. Let me get the radicalities over with first off, then, by saving that six years work has got me convinced that transformational grammar for sure does have a place in

    doi:10.2307/375700
  6. Pouring down Words
    doi:10.2307/356168