In an Afterword to their book Writing Across Discipline: Research into Practice, Art Young and Toby Fulwiler speak of the enemies of writing across curriculum (287) ... most significant of which, they suggest, may be collectively, a set of entrenched attitudes ... shared to some extent by faculty, administrators, students, and general public (292-3). The attitudes described are in many ways predictable, running from seeing of any organized attempt to change teaching strategy as an attack on academic freedom, all way down to such assertions as:

Preview this article: An Unpetty Pace, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ccc/23/5/collegecompositionandcommunication18167-1.gif

Preview this article: Freshman Composition: The Circle of Unbelief, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/31/2/collegeenglish20345-1.gif

Preview this article: Comment and Rebuttal: Comment on "The Teaching of Writing as Writing," CE November 1967, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/29/5/collegeenglish20797-1.gif

Jean H. Hagstrum, Samuel Schoenbaum, J. Leeds Barroll, R. E. K., Frances Shirley, J. W. Robinson, Robert C. Steensma, Michael Shugrue, William E. Coles, Jr., Nicholas A. Salerno, Stephen E. Henderson, Lawrence Poston, III, Leon O. Barron, Clifford A. Nault, Jr., Dale B. J. Randall, Marlies K. Danziger, Harry E. Hand, Kenneth S. Rothwell, Ted E. Boyle, Book Reviews, College English, Vol. 26, No. 1 (Oct., 1964), pp. 53-66

Preview this article: Round Table: Who Can Tell the Teacher from the Taught, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/25/1/collegeenglish27294-1.gif