Argumentation

1382 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

December 2003

  1. Pragma-dialectics and Beyond
    doi:10.1023/a:1026311002268
  2. Computational Dialogic Defeasible Reasoning
    doi:10.1023/a:1026342520498
  3. Introduction to Special Issue of Argumentation Originating in a Conference at The University of Texas at Austin
    doi:10.1023/a:1026365717772
  4. Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Problem-Solving Discussion
    doi:10.1023/a:1026364503176
  5. Within Pragma-dialectics: Comments on Bonevac
    doi:10.1023/a:1026312519106
  6. Bibliography Argumentation Studies 2001
    doi:10.1023/a:1026368606148

September 2003

  1. Frans H. van Eemeren (ed.) (2001), Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory
    doi:10.1023/a:1025159016942
  2. Neither Naïve nor Critical Reconstruction: Dispute Mediators, Impasse, and the Design of Argumentation
    doi:10.1023/a:1025112227381
  3. Dominicy, Marc & Frédéric, Madeleine (2001). La mise en scène des valeurs – la rhétorique de l'éloge et du blâme
    doi:10.1023/a:1025105804973
  4. Image Events, the Public Sphere, and Argumentative Practice: The Case of Radical Environmental Groups
    doi:10.1023/a:1025179019397
  5. Monotonicity in Practical Reasoning
    doi:10.1023/a:1025164703468
  6. Logical Argument Structures in Decision-making
    doi:10.1023/a:1025117226851
  7. Stati, Sorin, Principi di analisi argomentativa (2002)
    doi:10.1023/a:1025183208407

June 2003

  1. Reconsidering Contentious Argument: Augustus DeMorgan on Fallacy
    doi:10.1023/a:1024074132005
  2. Formal Dialectic in Fallacy Inquiry: An Unintelligible Circumscription of Argumentative Rationality?
    doi:10.1023/a:1024096813605
  3. Millgram, Elijah (ed.), Varieties of Practical Reasoning (2001)
    doi:10.1023/a:1024047703414
  4. Arguing at Cross-Purposes: Discharging the Dialectical Obligations of the Coalescent Model of Argumentation
    doi:10.1023/a:1024032009784
  5. What Are We to Think about Thought Experiments?
    doi:10.1023/a:1024071710337
  6. Using Toulmin's Framework for the Analysis of Everyday Argumentation: Some Methodological Considerations
    doi:10.1023/a:1024059024337
  7. Call for Papers
    doi:10.1023/a:1024064509711
  8. Seeing Reasons: Visual Argumentation in Advertisements
    doi:10.1023/a:1024025114369
  9. Sloane, Thomas O. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Rhetoric (2001)
    doi:10.1023/a:1024079006116
  10. Josina M. Makau and Debian L. Marty (eds.), Cooperative Argumentation: A Model of Deliberative Community (2001)
    doi:10.1023/a:1024041910816

March 2003

  1. Rational Comprehension of Arguments in Theoretical Texts: A Program for an Argumentative-Linguistic Approach
    doi:10.1023/a:1022946330299
  2. Begging the Question: A Case Study
    doi:10.1023/a:1022908405402
  3. Schmetz, Roland (2000). L'argumentation selon Perelman. Pour une raison au cœur de la rhétorique
    doi:10.1023/a:1022982420903
  4. Special Section on Argumentation and Paradoxes. Introduction
    doi:10.1023/a:1022970223994
  5. Paradoxes in the Argumentation of the Comic Double and Classemic Contradiction
    doi:10.1023/a:1022904025811
  6. Antonyms and Paradoxes
    doi:10.1023/a:1022956009881
  7. Who Needs Valid Moral Arguments? (Dedicated to the Memory of R.M. Chisholm, 1916–1999)
    doi:10.1023/a:1022950020703
  8. Logical, Semantic and Cultural Paradoxes
    doi:10.1023/a:1022999824902
  9. Leah Ceccarelli (2001) Shaping Science with Rhetoric: The cases of Dobzhansky, Schrödinger, and Wilson
    doi:10.1023/a:1022936104750
  10. Persuasive Paradoxes in Cicero's Speeches
    doi:10.1023/a:1022947808064
  11. Paradoxes in Aulus Gellius
    doi:10.1023/a:1022951908973

December 2002

  1. The Final Days: The Development of Argumentative Discourse in the Soviet Union
    doi:10.1023/a:1021119728900
  2. Pinto, Robert C. (2001) Argument, Inference and Dialectic
    doi:10.1023/a:1021117705089
  3. Contents of Volume 16
    doi:10.1023/a:1021115300038
  4. When Is Genetic Reasoning Not Fallacious?
    doi:10.1023/a:1021132731699
  5. Tindale, Christopher W. (2000). Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1021143521019
  6. The Moral Dilemmas Debate, Deontic Logic, and the Impotence of Argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1021182606590
  7. The Sunk Costs Fallacy or Argument from Waste
    doi:10.1023/a:1021108016075
  8. In Search of Criteria for ‘Fallacies’ and ‘Begging the Question’
    doi:10.1023/a:1021158632437
  9. Reasons for Reason-giving in a Public-Opinion Survey
    doi:10.1023/a:1021138703400

September 2002

  1. A Concept Divided: Ralph Johnson's Definition of Argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1019997120075
  2. The Greek Roots of the Ad Hominem-Argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1019967112062
  3. The Practice of Argumentative Discussion
    doi:10.1023/a:1019945119167
  4. An Exploration of Johnson's Sense of ‘Argument’
    doi:10.1023/a:1019941018258
  5. A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context
    doi:10.1023/a:1019999606665
  6. Manifest Rationality Reconsidered: Reply to my Fellow Symposiasts
    doi:10.1023/a:1019901304146
  7. Goldman, Alvin I. (1999), Knowledge in a Social World
    doi:10.1023/a:1019953612877