Argumentation

1391 articles
Year: – Topic:
Export:

January 2004

  1. Jan 2004
    Book review ↗
    R. H. Johnson
    book reviews
    doi:10.1007/s10503-005-1076-8
  2. Jan 2004
    Book Review: John Woods, Paradox and Paraconsistency: Conflict Resolution in the Abstract Sciences (2003). Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity Press. pp. xviii+362, ISBN 0-521-81094-9 (cloth), 0-521-00934-0 (paper). ↗
    Erik C.W. Krabbe
    book reviews
    doi:10.1007/s10503-004-6192-3
  3. Jan 2004
    Book review ↗
    Claude Gratton
    book reviews
    doi:10.1007/s10503-005-5948-8

December 2003

  1. Dec 2003
    Contents of Volume 17 ↗
    doi:10.1023/a:1026303105240
  2. Dec 2003
    Toward an Alliance Between the Issue-Processing Approach and Pragma-Dialectical Analysis ↗
    David Braybrooke
    doi:10.1023/a:1026302807294
  3. Dec 2003
    Common Ground, Corrections, and Coordination ↗
    Nicholas Asher; Anthony Gillies
    doi:10.1023/a:1026346605477
  4. Dec 2003
    A Pragma-dialectical Procedure for a Critical Discussion ↗
    Frans H. van Eemeren; Rob Grootendorst
    doi:10.1023/a:1026334218681
  5. Dec 2003
    Complex Argumentation in a Critical Discussion ↗
    A. F. Snoeck Henkemans
    argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1026390419589
  6. Dec 2003
    The Development of the Pragma-dialectical Approach to Argumentation ↗
    Frans H. van Eemeren; Peter Houtlosser
    argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1026338402751
  7. Dec 2003
    Pragma-dialectics and Beyond ↗
    Daniel Bonevac
    doi:10.1023/a:1026311002268
  8. Dec 2003
    Computational Dialogic Defeasible Reasoning ↗
    Robert L. Causey
    doi:10.1023/a:1026342520498
  9. Dec 2003
    Introduction to Special Issue of Argumentation Originating in a Conference at The University of Texas at Austin ↗
    David Braybrooke
    argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1026365717772
  10. Dec 2003
    Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Problem-Solving Discussion ↗
    M. A. van Rees
    assessment
    doi:10.1023/a:1026364503176
  11. Dec 2003
    Within Pragma-dialectics: Comments on Bonevac ↗
    M. A. van Rees
    editorial matter
    doi:10.1023/a:1026312519106
  12. Dec 2003
    Bibliography Argumentation Studies 2001 ↗
    E. T. Feteris; P. Houtlosser
    argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1026368606148

September 2003

  1. Sep 2003
    Frans H. van Eemeren (ed.) (2001), Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory ↗
    Erik C. W. Krabbe
    argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1025159016942
  2. Sep 2003
    Neither Naïve nor Critical Reconstruction: Dispute Mediators, Impasse, and the Design of Argumentation ↗
    Mark Aakhus
    argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1025112227381
  3. Sep 2003
    Dominicy, Marc & Frédéric, Madeleine (2001). La mise en scène des valeurs – la rhétorique de l'éloge et du blâme ↗
    Christian Plantin
    doi:10.1023/a:1025105804973
  4. Sep 2003
    Image Events, the Public Sphere, and Argumentative Practice: The Case of Radical Environmental Groups ↗
    John W. Delicath; Kevin Michael DeLuca
    public rhetoric
    doi:10.1023/a:1025179019397
  5. Sep 2003
    Monotonicity in Practical Reasoning ↗
    Kenneth G. Ferguson
    argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1025164703468
  6. Sep 2003
    Logical Argument Structures in Decision-making ↗
    Jane Macoubrie
    argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1025117226851
  7. Sep 2003
    Stati, Sorin, Principi di analisi argomentativa (2002) ↗
    Alessandro Capone
    doi:10.1023/a:1025183208407

June 2003

  1. Jun 2003
    Reconsidering Contentious Argument: Augustus DeMorgan on Fallacy ↗
    Marie J. Secor
    doi:10.1023/a:1024074132005
  2. Jun 2003
    Formal Dialectic in Fallacy Inquiry: An Unintelligible Circumscription of Argumentative Rationality? ↗
    Louise Cummings
    doi:10.1023/a:1024096813605
  3. Jun 2003
    Millgram, Elijah (ed.), Varieties of Practical Reasoning (2001) ↗
    Eveline T. Feteris
    argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1024047703414
  4. Jun 2003
    Arguing at Cross-Purposes: Discharging the Dialectical Obligations of the Coalescent Model of Argumentation ↗
    David M. Godden
    argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1024032009784
  5. Jun 2003
    What Are We to Think about Thought Experiments? ↗
    Lawrence Souder
    doi:10.1023/a:1024071710337
  6. Jun 2003
    Using Toulmin's Framework for the Analysis of Everyday Argumentation: Some Methodological Considerations ↗
    Maria Simosi
    argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1024059024337
  7. Jun 2003
    Call for Papers ↗
    editorial matter
    doi:10.1023/a:1024064509711
  8. Jun 2003
    Seeing Reasons: Visual Argumentation in Advertisements ↗
    Christina Slade
    argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1024025114369
  9. Jun 2003
    Sloane, Thomas O. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Rhetoric (2001) ↗
    Manfred Kienpointner
    rhetorical criticism
    doi:10.1023/a:1024079006116
  10. Jun 2003
    Josina M. Makau and Debian L. Marty (eds.), Cooperative Argumentation: A Model of Deliberative Community (2001) ↗
    Christopher Tindal
    argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1024041910816

March 2003

  1. Mar 2003
    Rational Comprehension of Arguments in Theoretical Texts: A Program for an Argumentative-Linguistic Approach ↗
    Lev G. Vassiliev
    doi:10.1023/a:1022946330299
  2. Mar 2003
    Begging the Question: A Case Study ↗
    Juho Ritola
    qualitative research
    doi:10.1023/a:1022908405402
  3. Mar 2003
    Schmetz, Roland (2000). L'argumentation selon Perelman. Pour une raison au cœur de la rhétorique ↗
    Christian Plantin
    argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1022982420903
  4. Mar 2003
    Special Section on Argumentation and Paradoxes. Introduction ↗
    Manfred Kienpointner
    argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1022970223994
  5. Mar 2003
    Paradoxes in the Argumentation of the Comic Double and Classemic Contradiction ↗
    Benjamín García-Hernández
    argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1022904025811
  6. Mar 2003
    Antonyms and Paradoxes ↗
    Alessandra Bertocchi
    doi:10.1023/a:1022956009881
  7. Mar 2003
    Who Needs Valid Moral Arguments? (Dedicated to the Memory of R.M. Chisholm, 1916–1999) ↗
    Mark T. Nelson
    doi:10.1023/a:1022950020703
  8. Mar 2003
    Logical, Semantic and Cultural Paradoxes ↗
    Anna Orlandini
    doi:10.1023/a:1022999824902
  9. Mar 2003
    Leah Ceccarelli (2001) Shaping Science with Rhetoric: The cases of Dobzhansky, Schrödinger, and Wilson ↗
    William Keith
    rhetorical criticism
    doi:10.1023/a:1022936104750
  10. Mar 2003
    Persuasive Paradoxes in Cicero's Speeches ↗
    Manfred Kienpointner
    classical rhetoric
    doi:10.1023/a:1022947808064
  11. Mar 2003
    Paradoxes in Aulus Gellius ↗
    Alessandro Garcea
    doi:10.1023/a:1022951908973

December 2002

  1. Dec 2002
    The Final Days: The Development of Argumentative Discourse in the Soviet Union ↗
    Marilyn J. Young; Michael K. Launer
    discourse analysis
    doi:10.1023/a:1021119728900
  2. Dec 2002
    Pinto, Robert C. (2001) Argument, Inference and Dialectic ↗
    Jim Mackenzie
    doi:10.1023/a:1021117705089
  3. Dec 2002
    Contents of Volume 16 ↗
    doi:10.1023/a:1021115300038
  4. Dec 2002
    When Is Genetic Reasoning Not Fallacious? ↗
    Kevin C. Klement
    doi:10.1023/a:1021132731699
  5. Dec 2002
    Tindale, Christopher W. (2000). Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument ↗
    Charles Arthur Willard
    rhetorical criticism
    doi:10.1023/a:1021143521019
  6. Dec 2002
    The Moral Dilemmas Debate, Deontic Logic, and the Impotence of Argument ↗
    Todd Bernard Weber
    argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1021182606590
  7. Dec 2002
    The Sunk Costs Fallacy or Argument from Waste ↗
    Douglas Walton
    doi:10.1023/a:1021108016075