Argumentation

1382 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

March 2005

  1. Werner Schmidt-Faber (2003). Einerseits –Andererseits. Untersuchungen zur Konfrontation normativer Argumente. Dissertation/Fern-Universität Hagen, 264 pp.
    doi:10.1007/s10503-005-1929-1
  2. The Common Topic in Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Precursor of the Argumentation Scheme
    doi:10.1007/s10503-005-2313-x

December 2004

  1. Analogical Reasoning as a Tool of Epidemiological Investigation
    doi:10.1007/s10503-004-6862-1
  2. Certainty, Reasonableness and Argumentation in Law
    doi:10.1007/s10503-004-5890-1

September 2004

  1. Is Modernism Really Modern? Uncovering a Fallacy in Postmodernism
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000046715.74696.82
  2. Monologic and Dialogic Styles of Argumentation: A Bakhtinian Analysis of Academic Debates between Mainland China and Taiwan
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000046730.40288.46
  3. Shedding Dialectical Tiers: A Social-Epistemic View
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000046716.23529.a5
  4. Book Review
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000046841.01045.20
  5. Running in Circles about Begging the Question
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000046731.07528.75
  6. Book Review
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000046840.86936.a1
  7. Book Review
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000046839.49299.8f
  8. Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000046706.45919.83
  9. Argument as Cognition: A Putnamian Criticism of Dale Hample’s Cognitive Conception of Argument
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000046705.75177.75
  10. Argumentation Schemes in Persuasive Brochures
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000046707.68172.35
  11. Book Review
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000046838.26635.04

June 2004

  1. On the Theoretical Unification and Nature of Fallacies
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000024021.99800.90
  2. Analogy Counterarguments: A Taxonomy for Critical Thinking
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000024025.45062.24
  3. Philosophical Argumentation: Logic and Rhetoric
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000024019.33248.8c
  4. Rehabilitating AI: Argument Loci and the Case for Artificial Intelligence
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000024023.55226.59
  5. On Argumentation Schemes and the Natural Classification of Arguments
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000024044.34360.82
  6. The Comparative Set Fallacy
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000024022.45061.c7
  7. Geert-Lueke Lueken (Hg.) (2000). Formen der Argumentation
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000024104.70502.79
  8. Douglas Walton (2000), Scare Tactics: Arguments that Appeal to Fear and Threats
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000024105.02302.3a

March 2004

  1. Formal Propriety as Rhetorical Norm
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000014871.72377.a6
  2. Cogency and the Validation of Induction
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000014869.24575.5b
  3. Rejecting the Urge to Theorise in Fallacy Inquiry
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000014818.10143.32
  4. Authority-based Argumentative Strategies: A Model for their Evaluation
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000014817.31435.87
  5. The Oldest Typology of Argumentation Schemes
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000014872.98819.85
  6. Argument in a Nutshell: Condensation as a Transfiguring Mechanism in Argumentative Discourse
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000014870.56718.6c
  7. Negotiation, Persuasion and Argument
    doi:10.1023/b:argu.0000014868.08915.2a

January 2004

  1. Eemeren, Frans H. van, Grootendorst, Rob and Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca (2002). Argumentation. Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation
    doi:10.1007/s10503-004-5948-0
  2. Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser (Eds.) (2002). Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis
    doi:10.1007/s10503-004-1076-0
  3. Book review
    doi:10.1007/s10503-005-1075-9
  4. Analogical reasoning as a tool of epidemiological investigation
    doi:10.1007/s10503-005-6862-9
  5. Ekkehard Eggs (HG.) (2002). Topo�, Discours, Arguments
    doi:10.1007/s10503-004-1075-1
  6. Shedding Dialectical Tiers: A Social-Epistemic View
    doi:10.1007/s10503-004-5889-7
  7. Educational Background, Modes of Discourse and Argumentation: Comparing Women and Men
    doi:10.1007/s10503-004-4906-1
  8. Certainty, reasonableness and argumentation in law
    doi:10.1007/s10503-005-5890-9
  9. Bibiliography Argumentation Studies 2002
    doi:10.1007/s10503-004-5450-8
  10. Contents of volume 18
    doi:10.1007/s10503-004-8007-y
  11. Think Before You Speak: Utterances and the Logic of Indexicals
    doi:10.1007/s10503-004-4907-0
  12. Book review
    doi:10.1007/s10503-005-1076-8
  13. Book Review: John Woods, Paradox and Paraconsistency: Conflict Resolution in the Abstract Sciences (2003). Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity Press. pp. xviii+362, ISBN 0-521-81094-9 (cloth), 0-521-00934-0 (paper).
    doi:10.1007/s10503-004-6192-3
  14. Book review
    doi:10.1007/s10503-005-5948-8

December 2003

  1. Contents of Volume 17
    doi:10.1023/a:1026303105240
  2. Toward an Alliance Between the Issue-Processing Approach and Pragma-Dialectical Analysis
    doi:10.1023/a:1026302807294
  3. Common Ground, Corrections, and Coordination
    doi:10.1023/a:1026346605477
  4. A Pragma-dialectical Procedure for a Critical Discussion
    doi:10.1023/a:1026334218681
  5. Complex Argumentation in a Critical Discussion
    doi:10.1023/a:1026390419589
  6. The Development of the Pragma-dialectical Approach to Argumentation
    doi:10.1023/a:1026338402751